[Lustre-discuss] client randomly evicted
Yong Fan
Yong.Fan at Sun.COM
Thu May 15 01:36:31 PDT 2008
Robin Humble 写道:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 03:16:31PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>
>> On Apr 30, 2008 11:40 -0400, Aaron Knister wrote:
>>
>>> Some more information that might be helpful. There is a particular code
>>> that one of our users runs. Personally after the trouble this code has
>>> caused us we'd like to hand him a calculator and disable his accounts but
>>> sadly that's not an option. Since the time of the hang, there is what seems
>>> to be one process associated with lustre that is running as the userid of
>>> the problem user- "ll_sa_15530". A trace of this process in its current
>>> state shows this -
>>>
>>> Is this a problem with the lustre readahead code? If so would this fix it?
>>> "echo 0 > /proc/fs/lustre/llite/*/statahead_count "
>>>
>> Yes, this appears to be a statahead problem. There were fixes added to
>> 1.6.5 that should resolve the problems seen with statahead. In the meantime
>> I'd recommend disabling it as you suggest above.
>>
>
> we're seeing the same problem.
>
> I think the workaround should be:
> echo 0 > /proc/fs/lustre/llite/*/statahead_max
> ??
>
> /proc/fs/lustre/llite/*/statahead_count is -r--r--r--
>
Sure.
"/proc/fs/lustre/llite/*/statahead_count" is statistics variable.
"/proc/fs/lustre/llite/*/statahead_max " is the switch for
enable/disable directory statahead.
Regrads!
--
Fan Yong
> cheers,
> robin
>
> ps. sorry I've been too busy this week to look at the llite_lloop stuff.
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list