[Lustre-devel] Moving forward on Quotas
johann at sun.com
Fri Jun 6 00:33:13 PDT 2008
On Thu, Jun 05, 2008 at 06:45:36AM -0700, Peter Braam wrote:
> Well, this protocol hasn't been published yet; why not include the server
> side uid / gid then?
I understood from Fanyong that according to the remote client design
requirements, we should not allow the remote client to access the server-side
> But more seriously, how is this encoded in such a way that the OST can trust
> the information - it must be in the capability too?
hmm, I don't see any capability associated with this.
More information about the lustre-devel