[Lustre-devel] Some investigations on MDS creation rate
Oleg Drokin
Oleg.Drokin at Sun.COM
Mon Feb 16 13:05:07 PST 2009
Hello!
On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:26 AM, Alex Zhuravlev wrote:
> Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> I also performed tests on HEAD and it performs significantly
>> worse (5.8k at most). Even with all the same fixes ported from b1_6.
>> The CPU remains the same and I used lock meter to verify that
>> there is no significant lock contention.
>> Looking into the oprofile results, it looks like all code just
>> became slower (judging by more hits in various areas for the same
>> workload).
>> Also some parts of the code are now more heavily loaded (ptlrpc
>> +ldlm in HEAD draws more cpu time, llite portion of the code is
>> 50% more time
> notice HEAD takes two ldlm locks for each create, 1.6 takes one.
What is the other one? I am looking at mdt_md_create and I see it
locks parent, but not child, just like b1_6.
Bye,
Oleg
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list