[lustre-devel] lustre design docs
andreas.dilger at intel.com
Fri Jun 12 14:53:02 PDT 2015
I agree - there are a lot of documents spread across many places (old
wiki, new wiki, opensfs wiki, HPDD wiki, old CVS "lustre-doc" repo, etc).
Just getting those into a central location would be a good start.
Obviously many of those documents are outdated, but I think even those
would be valuable as long as it is clear at the top of the document what
state it is in (e.g. having the date of origin and a description of the
status like obsolete, stale, useful, up-to-date, etc).
I think Richard has been uploading some of our more recent design docs to
the new wiki, so that would be as good a place to start as any.
On 2015/06/12, 3:04 PM, "Justin Miller" <jmiller at cray.com> wrote:
>I think a central document repository is a good idea, and would be a
>valuable asset. The plan you outline to collect the documents and
>metadata first and then convert the most useful documents to a
>maintainable format makes a lot of sense. In addition to the benefits you
>identify, it may also allow for the collection of some interesting
>I¹d be happy to help with this project.
>- Justin Miller
>On 5/20/15, 1:06 PM, "lustre-devel on behalf of Vitaly Fertman"
><lustre-devel-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of
>vitaly.fertman at seagate.com> wrote:
>>there was an idea to publish existing design docs on opensfs wiki.
>>is centralised design repository interesting at all?
>>currently the existing designs are not in the wiki format, mostly pdf,
>>so this is
>>not an ideal doc repository we want to have: not changeable, not
>>could be outdated, etc, but could be published very quickly.
>>however, this is not the final step but just a beginning. at the same
>>time, we may get
>>some benefits immediately:
>>- all the docs are gathered in one centralised place, faster doc search;
>>- the fully documented product (although maybe not very up-to-date
>>attractive for many readers, especially newbies;
>>- a quick jump to unknown code having a design, faster than reading the
>>after that, having these docs already published, next steps could be:
>>- docs to be split on those which are to be maintained and left
>>- a procedure of converting to be maintained docs to wiki format could
>>- a procedure of updating converted docs to be organised;
>>would be valuable? thoughts?
>>lustre-devel mailing list
>>lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
>lustre-devel mailing list
>lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
Lustre Software Architect
Intel High Performance Data Division
More information about the lustre-devel