[lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: cl_lock: Remove cl_lock_lockdep_init wrapper

Shivani Bhardwaj shivanib134 at gmail.com
Wed Nov 11 09:33:34 PST 2015


On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:01 PM, Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 10:51:36PM +0530, Shivani Bhardwaj wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 4:24 PM, kbuild test robot <lkp at intel.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Shivani,
>> >
>> > [auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
>> > [also build test ERROR on v4.3 next-20151111]
>> >
>> > url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Shivani-Bhardwaj/staging-lustre-cl_lock-Remove-cl_lock_lockdep_init-wrapper/20151111-182452
>> > config: m68k-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
>> > reproduce:
>> >         wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>> >         chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>> >         # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>> >         make.cross ARCH=m68k
>> >
>> > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> >
>> >    In file included from include/linux/spinlock_types.h:18:0,
>> >                     from include/linux/spinlock.h:81,
>> >                     from include/linux/mmzone.h:7,
>> >                     from include/linux/gfp.h:5,
>> >                     from include/linux/slab.h:14,
>> >                     from drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/obd_support.h:40,
>> >                     from drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/../include/obd_class.h:39,
>> >                     from drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c:43:
>> >    drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c: In function 'cl_lock_alloc':
>> >>> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c:379:37: error: 'cl_lock_key' undeclared (first use in this function)
>> >       lockdep_set_class_and_name(lock, &cl_lock_key, "EXT");
>> >                                         ^
>> >    include/linux/lockdep.h:401:15: note: in definition of macro 'lockdep_set_class_and_name'
>> >       do { (void)(key); (void)(name); } while (0)
>> >                   ^
>> >    drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c:379:37: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> >       lockdep_set_class_and_name(lock, &cl_lock_key, "EXT");
>> >                                         ^
>> >    include/linux/lockdep.h:401:15: note: in definition of macro 'lockdep_set_class_and_name'
>> >       do { (void)(key); (void)(name); } while (0)
>> >                   ^
>> >    drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c: At top level:
>> >    drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c:166:13: warning: 'cl_lock_lockdep_init' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>> >     static void cl_lock_lockdep_init(struct cl_lock *lock)
>> >                 ^
>> >
>> > vim +/cl_lock_key +379 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/cl_lock.c
>> >
>> >    373                  lockdep_set_class(&lock->cll_guard, &cl_lock_guard_class);
>> >    374                  init_waitqueue_head(&lock->cll_wq);
>> >    375                  head = obj->co_lu.lo_header;
>> >    376                  CS_LOCKSTATE_INC(obj, CLS_NEW);
>> >    377                  CS_LOCK_INC(obj, total);
>> >    378                  CS_LOCK_INC(obj, create);
>> >  > 379                  lockdep_set_class_and_name(lock, &cl_lock_key, "EXT");
>> >    380                  list_for_each_entry(obj, &head->loh_layers,
>> >    381                                          co_lu.lo_linkage) {
>> >    382                          int err;
>> >
>> > ---
>> > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
>> > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm not getting any of these errors at compilation. I've checked
>> thrice. Could you please tell what am I doing wrong so that I can
>> avoid introducing errors in future patches?
>
> Use the .config provided, odds are you have lockdep enabled.

Thanks Greg.
I tried that. Still no errors. Any other suggestion?


More information about the lustre-devel mailing list