[lustre-devel] [bug report] staging: add Lustre file system client support

[Dan Carpenter]

On Tue, Dec 06, 2016 at 10:44:54AM -0500, Oleg Drokin wrote:
> I see, indeed, it all makes sense now.
> So basically if we unconditionally check for the size to be > 0, we should be
> fine then, I imagine.
> On the other hand there's probably no se for no param and nonzero param len,
> so it's probably even better to enforce size as zero when no param.

Checking for > 0 is not enough, because it could also have an integer
overflow on 32 bit systems.  We need to cap the upper bound as well.

regards,
dan carpenter