[lustre-devel] [PATCH 46/56] staging/lustre/ldlm: Adjust comments to better conform to coding style

green at linuxhacker.ru green at linuxhacker.ru
Mon Feb 22 18:54:24 PST 2016


From: Oleg Drokin <green at linuxhacker.ru>

This patch fixes "Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line"
warnings from checkpatch.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green at linuxhacker.ru>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c |   6 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c   |  12 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c    |  43 ++++---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h |   3 +-
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c      |  27 +++--
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c     |  63 ++++++----
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c    |  36 ++++--
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c  | 132 ++++++++++++++-------
 drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c |  36 ++++--
 9 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 122 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c
index fd70f65..3230606 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/interval_tree.c
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ static void __rotate_change_maxhigh(struct interval_node *node,
 
 /* The left rotation "pivots" around the link from node to node->right, and
  * - node will be linked to node->right's left child, and
- * - node->right's left child will be linked to node's right child.  */
+ * - node->right's left child will be linked to node's right child.
+ */
 static void __rotate_left(struct interval_node *node,
 			  struct interval_node **root)
 {
@@ -162,7 +163,8 @@ static void __rotate_left(struct interval_node *node,
 
 /* The right rotation "pivots" around the link from node to node->left, and
  * - node will be linked to node->left's right child, and
- * - node->left's right child will be linked to node's left child.  */
+ * - node->left's right child will be linked to node's left child.
+ */
 static void __rotate_right(struct interval_node *node,
 			   struct interval_node **root)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c
index f07a077..222cb62 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@
  * is the "highest lock".  This function returns the new KMS value.
  * Caller must hold lr_lock already.
  *
- * NB: A lock on [x,y] protects a KMS of up to y + 1 bytes! */
+ * NB: A lock on [x,y] protects a KMS of up to y + 1 bytes!
+ */
 __u64 ldlm_extent_shift_kms(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 old_kms)
 {
 	struct ldlm_resource *res = lock->l_resource;
@@ -72,7 +73,8 @@ __u64 ldlm_extent_shift_kms(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 old_kms)
 
 	/* don't let another thread in ldlm_extent_shift_kms race in
 	 * just after we finish and take our lock into account in its
-	 * calculation of the kms */
+	 * calculation of the kms
+	 */
 	lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_KMS_IGNORE;
 
 	list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
@@ -85,7 +87,8 @@ __u64 ldlm_extent_shift_kms(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 old_kms)
 			return old_kms;
 
 		/* This extent _has_ to be smaller than old_kms (checked above)
-		 * so kms can only ever be smaller or the same as old_kms. */
+		 * so kms can only ever be smaller or the same as old_kms.
+		 */
 		if (lck->l_policy_data.l_extent.end + 1 > kms)
 			kms = lck->l_policy_data.l_extent.end + 1;
 	}
@@ -191,7 +194,8 @@ void ldlm_extent_add_lock(struct ldlm_resource *res,
 	res->lr_itree[idx].lit_size++;
 
 	/* even though we use interval tree to manage the extent lock, we also
-	 * add the locks into grant list, for debug purpose, .. */
+	 * add the locks into grant list, for debug purpose, ..
+	 */
 	ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, &res->lr_granted, lock);
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
index 8bd6a18..b88b786 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c
@@ -107,7 +107,8 @@ ldlm_flock_destroy(struct ldlm_lock *lock, enum ldlm_mode mode, __u64 flags)
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY | LDLM_FL_CBPENDING;
 
 		/* when reaching here, it is under lock_res_and_lock(). Thus,
-		   need call the nolock version of ldlm_lock_decref_internal*/
+		 * need call the nolock version of ldlm_lock_decref_internal
+		 */
 		ldlm_lock_decref_internal_nolock(lock, mode);
 	}
 
@@ -159,13 +160,15 @@ static int ldlm_process_flock_lock(struct ldlm_lock *req, __u64 *flags,
 	*err = ELDLM_OK;
 
 	/* No blocking ASTs are sent to the clients for
-	 * Posix file & record locks */
+	 * Posix file & record locks
+	 */
 	req->l_blocking_ast = NULL;
 
 reprocess:
 	if ((*flags == LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC) || (mode == LCK_NL)) {
 		/* This loop determines where this processes locks start
-		 * in the resource lr_granted list. */
+		 * in the resource lr_granted list.
+		 */
 		list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
 			lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock,
 					      l_res_link);
@@ -180,7 +183,8 @@ reprocess:
 		lockmode_verify(mode);
 
 		/* This loop determines if there are existing locks
-		 * that conflict with the new lock request. */
+		 * that conflict with the new lock request.
+		 */
 		list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
 			lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock,
 					      l_res_link);
@@ -238,8 +242,8 @@ reprocess:
 	}
 
 	/* Scan the locks owned by this process that overlap this request.
-	 * We may have to merge or split existing locks. */
-
+	 * We may have to merge or split existing locks.
+	 */
 	if (!ownlocks)
 		ownlocks = &res->lr_granted;
 
@@ -253,7 +257,8 @@ reprocess:
 			/* If the modes are the same then we need to process
 			 * locks that overlap OR adjoin the new lock. The extra
 			 * logic condition is necessary to deal with arithmetic
-			 * overflow and underflow. */
+			 * overflow and underflow.
+			 */
 			if ((new->l_policy_data.l_flock.start >
 			     (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end + 1))
 			    && (lock->l_policy_data.l_flock.end !=
@@ -327,11 +332,13 @@ reprocess:
 		 * with the request but this would complicate the reply
 		 * processing since updates to req get reflected in the
 		 * reply. The client side replays the lock request so
-		 * it must see the original lock data in the reply. */
+		 * it must see the original lock data in the reply.
+		 */
 
 		/* XXX - if ldlm_lock_new() can sleep we should
 		 * release the lr_lock, allocate the new lock,
-		 * and restart processing this lock. */
+		 * and restart processing this lock.
+		 */
 		if (!new2) {
 			unlock_res_and_lock(req);
 			new2 = ldlm_lock_create(ns, &res->lr_name, LDLM_FLOCK,
@@ -396,7 +403,8 @@ reprocess:
 	if (*flags != LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC) {
 		/* The only one possible case for client-side calls flock
 		 * policy function is ldlm_flock_completion_ast inside which
-		 * carries LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC flag. */
+		 * carries LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC flag.
+		 */
 		CERROR("Illegal parameter for client-side-only module.\n");
 		LBUG();
 	}
@@ -404,7 +412,8 @@ reprocess:
 	/* In case we're reprocessing the requested lock we can't destroy
 	 * it until after calling ldlm_add_ast_work_item() above so that laawi()
 	 * can bump the reference count on \a req. Otherwise \a req
-	 * could be freed before the completion AST can be sent.  */
+	 * could be freed before the completion AST can be sent.
+	 */
 	if (added)
 		ldlm_flock_destroy(req, mode, *flags);
 
@@ -458,7 +467,8 @@ ldlm_flock_completion_ast(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 flags, void *data)
 	/* Import invalidation. We need to actually release the lock
 	 * references being held, so that it can go away. No point in
 	 * holding the lock even if app still believes it has it, since
-	 * server already dropped it anyway. Only for granted locks too. */
+	 * server already dropped it anyway. Only for granted locks too.
+	 */
 	if ((lock->l_flags & (LDLM_FL_FAILED|LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY)) ==
 	    (LDLM_FL_FAILED|LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY)) {
 		if (lock->l_req_mode == lock->l_granted_mode &&
@@ -539,7 +549,8 @@ granted:
 	} else if (flags & LDLM_FL_TEST_LOCK) {
 		/* fcntl(F_GETLK) request */
 		/* The old mode was saved in getlk->fl_type so that if the mode
-		 * in the lock changes we can decref the appropriate refcount.*/
+		 * in the lock changes we can decref the appropriate refcount.
+		 */
 		ldlm_flock_destroy(lock, getlk->fl_type, LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC);
 		switch (lock->l_granted_mode) {
 		case LCK_PR:
@@ -558,7 +569,8 @@ granted:
 		__u64 noreproc = LDLM_FL_WAIT_NOREPROC;
 
 		/* We need to reprocess the lock to do merges or splits
-		 * with existing locks owned by this process. */
+		 * with existing locks owned by this process.
+		 */
 		ldlm_process_flock_lock(lock, &noreproc, 1, &err, NULL);
 	}
 	unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
@@ -575,7 +587,8 @@ void ldlm_flock_policy_wire18_to_local(const ldlm_wire_policy_data_t *wpolicy,
 	lpolicy->l_flock.pid = wpolicy->l_flock.lfw_pid;
 	/* Compat code, old clients had no idea about owner field and
 	 * relied solely on pid for ownership. Introduced in LU-104, 2.1,
-	 * April 2011 */
+	 * April 2011
+	 */
 	lpolicy->l_flock.owner = wpolicy->l_flock.lfw_pid;
 }
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h
index 2139a3a..e21373e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_internal.h
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ enum {
 	LDLM_CANCEL_SHRINK = 1 << 2, /* Cancel locks from shrinker. */
 	LDLM_CANCEL_LRUR   = 1 << 3, /* Cancel locks from lru resize. */
 	LDLM_CANCEL_NO_WAIT = 1 << 4 /* Cancel locks w/o blocking (neither
-				      * sending nor waiting for any rpcs) */
+				      * sending nor waiting for any rpcs)
+				      */
 };
 
 int ldlm_cancel_lru(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, int nr,
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c
index d0ad28d..b586d5a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lib.c
@@ -219,7 +219,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(client_import_find_conn);
 void client_destroy_import(struct obd_import *imp)
 {
 	/* Drop security policy instance after all RPCs have finished/aborted
-	 * to let all busy contexts be released. */
+	 * to let all busy contexts be released.
+	 */
 	class_import_get(imp);
 	class_destroy_import(imp);
 	sptlrpc_import_sec_put(imp);
@@ -245,7 +246,8 @@ int client_obd_setup(struct obd_device *obddev, struct lustre_cfg *lcfg)
 	int rc;
 
 	/* In a more perfect world, we would hang a ptlrpc_client off of
-	 * obd_type and just use the values from there. */
+	 * obd_type and just use the values from there.
+	 */
 	if (!strcmp(name, LUSTRE_OSC_NAME)) {
 		rq_portal = OST_REQUEST_PORTAL;
 		rp_portal = OSC_REPLY_PORTAL;
@@ -348,7 +350,8 @@ int client_obd_setup(struct obd_device *obddev, struct lustre_cfg *lcfg)
 	/* This value may be reduced at connect time in
 	 * ptlrpc_connect_interpret() . We initialize it to only
 	 * 1MB until we know what the performance looks like.
-	 * In the future this should likely be increased. LU-1431 */
+	 * In the future this should likely be increased. LU-1431
+	 */
 	cli->cl_max_pages_per_rpc = min_t(int, PTLRPC_MAX_BRW_PAGES,
 					  LNET_MTU >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
 
@@ -545,14 +548,16 @@ int client_disconnect_export(struct obd_export *exp)
 
 	/* Mark import deactivated now, so we don't try to reconnect if any
 	 * of the cleanup RPCs fails (e.g. LDLM cancel, etc).  We don't
-	 * fully deactivate the import, or that would drop all requests. */
+	 * fully deactivate the import, or that would drop all requests.
+	 */
 	spin_lock(&imp->imp_lock);
 	imp->imp_deactive = 1;
 	spin_unlock(&imp->imp_lock);
 
 	/* Some non-replayable imports (MDS's OSCs) are pinged, so just
 	 * delete it regardless.  (It's safe to delete an import that was
-	 * never added.) */
+	 * never added.)
+	 */
 	(void)ptlrpc_pinger_del_import(imp);
 
 	if (obd->obd_namespace) {
@@ -564,7 +569,8 @@ int client_disconnect_export(struct obd_export *exp)
 	}
 
 	/* There's no need to hold sem while disconnecting an import,
-	 * and it may actually cause deadlock in GSS. */
+	 * and it may actually cause deadlock in GSS.
+	 */
 	up_write(&cli->cl_sem);
 	rc = ptlrpc_disconnect_import(imp, 0);
 	down_write(&cli->cl_sem);
@@ -573,7 +579,8 @@ int client_disconnect_export(struct obd_export *exp)
 
 out_disconnect:
 	/* Use server style - class_disconnect should be always called for
-	 * o_disconnect. */
+	 * o_disconnect.
+	 */
 	err = class_disconnect(exp);
 	if (!rc && err)
 		rc = err;
@@ -592,7 +599,8 @@ int target_pack_pool_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 	struct obd_device *obd;
 
 	/* Check that we still have all structures alive as this may
-	 * be some late RPC at shutdown time. */
+	 * be some late RPC at shutdown time.
+	 */
 	if (unlikely(!req->rq_export || !req->rq_export->exp_obd ||
 		     !exp_connect_lru_resize(req->rq_export))) {
 		lustre_msg_set_slv(req->rq_repmsg, 0);
@@ -697,7 +705,8 @@ void target_send_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *req, int rc, int fail_id)
 		 * reply ref until ptlrpc_handle_rs() is done
 		 * with the reply state (if the send was successful, there
 		 * would have been +1 ref for the net, which
-		 * reply_out_callback leaves alone) */
+		 * reply_out_callback leaves alone)
+		 */
 		rs->rs_on_net = 0;
 		ptlrpc_rs_addref(rs);
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
index 65d0cfe..98975ef 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
@@ -326,9 +326,11 @@ static int ldlm_lock_destroy_internal(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 
 	if (lock->l_export && lock->l_export->exp_lock_hash) {
 		/* NB: it's safe to call cfs_hash_del() even lock isn't
-		 * in exp_lock_hash. */
+		 * in exp_lock_hash.
+		 */
 		/* In the function below, .hs_keycmp resolves to
-		 * ldlm_export_lock_keycmp() */
+		 * ldlm_export_lock_keycmp()
+		 */
 		/* coverity[overrun-buffer-val] */
 		cfs_hash_del(lock->l_export->exp_lock_hash,
 			     &lock->l_remote_handle, &lock->l_exp_hash);
@@ -540,7 +542,8 @@ struct ldlm_lock *__ldlm_handle2lock(const struct lustre_handle *handle,
 		return NULL;
 
 	/* It's unlikely but possible that someone marked the lock as
-	 * destroyed after we did handle2object on it */
+	 * destroyed after we did handle2object on it
+	 */
 	if (flags == 0 && ((lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_DESTROYED) == 0)) {
 		lu_ref_add(&lock->l_reference, "handle", current);
 		return lock;
@@ -600,7 +603,8 @@ static void ldlm_add_bl_work_item(struct ldlm_lock *lock, struct ldlm_lock *new,
 		LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "lock incompatible; sending blocking AST.");
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_AST_SENT;
 		/* If the enqueuing client said so, tell the AST recipient to
-		 * discard dirty data, rather than writing back. */
+		 * discard dirty data, rather than writing back.
+		 */
 		if (new->l_flags & LDLM_FL_AST_DISCARD_DATA)
 			lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_DISCARD_DATA;
 		LASSERT(list_empty(&lock->l_bl_ast));
@@ -769,7 +773,8 @@ void ldlm_lock_decref_internal(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u32 mode)
 	if (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_LOCAL &&
 	    !lock->l_readers && !lock->l_writers) {
 		/* If this is a local lock on a server namespace and this was
-		 * the last reference, cancel the lock. */
+		 * the last reference, cancel the lock.
+		 */
 		CDEBUG(D_INFO, "forcing cancel of local lock\n");
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_CBPENDING;
 	}
@@ -777,7 +782,8 @@ void ldlm_lock_decref_internal(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u32 mode)
 	if (!lock->l_readers && !lock->l_writers &&
 	    (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CBPENDING)) {
 		/* If we received a blocked AST and this was the last reference,
-		 * run the callback. */
+		 * run the callback.
+		 */
 
 		LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "final decref done on cbpending lock");
 
@@ -798,7 +804,8 @@ void ldlm_lock_decref_internal(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u32 mode)
 		LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "add lock into lru list");
 
 		/* If this is a client-side namespace and this was the last
-		 * reference, put it on the LRU. */
+		 * reference, put it on the LRU.
+		 */
 		ldlm_lock_add_to_lru(lock);
 		unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
 
@@ -807,7 +814,8 @@ void ldlm_lock_decref_internal(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u32 mode)
 
 		/* Call ldlm_cancel_lru() only if EARLY_CANCEL and LRU RESIZE
 		 * are not supported by the server, otherwise, it is done on
-		 * enqueue. */
+		 * enqueue.
+		 */
 		if (!exp_connect_cancelset(lock->l_conn_export) &&
 		    !ns_connect_lru_resize(ns))
 			ldlm_cancel_lru(ns, 0, LCF_ASYNC, 0);
@@ -910,7 +918,8 @@ static void search_granted_lock(struct list_head *queue,
 				if (lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits ==
 				    req->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits) {
 					/* insert point is last lock of
-					 * the policy group */
+					 * the policy group
+					 */
 					prev->res_link =
 						&policy_end->l_res_link;
 					prev->mode_link =
@@ -931,7 +940,8 @@ static void search_granted_lock(struct list_head *queue,
 			}  /* loop over policy groups within the mode group */
 
 			/* insert point is last lock of the mode group,
-			 * new policy group is started */
+			 * new policy group is started
+			 */
 			prev->res_link = &mode_end->l_res_link;
 			prev->mode_link = &mode_end->l_sl_mode;
 			prev->policy_link = &req->l_sl_policy;
@@ -943,7 +953,8 @@ static void search_granted_lock(struct list_head *queue,
 	}
 
 	/* insert point is last lock on the queue,
-	 * new mode group and new policy group are started */
+	 * new mode group and new policy group are started
+	 */
 	prev->res_link = queue->prev;
 	prev->mode_link = &req->l_sl_mode;
 	prev->policy_link = &req->l_sl_policy;
@@ -1053,7 +1064,8 @@ static struct ldlm_lock *search_queue(struct list_head *queue,
 			break;
 
 		/* Check if this lock can be matched.
-		 * Used by LU-2919(exclusive open) for open lease lock */
+		 * Used by LU-2919(exclusive open) for open lease lock
+		 */
 		if (ldlm_is_excl(lock))
 			continue;
 
@@ -1062,7 +1074,8 @@ static struct ldlm_lock *search_queue(struct list_head *queue,
 		 * if it passes in CBPENDING and the lock still has users.
 		 * this is generally only going to be used by children
 		 * whose parents already hold a lock so forward progress
-		 * can still happen. */
+		 * can still happen.
+		 */
 		if (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CBPENDING &&
 		    !(flags & LDLM_FL_CBPENDING))
 			continue;
@@ -1086,7 +1099,8 @@ static struct ldlm_lock *search_queue(struct list_head *queue,
 			continue;
 
 		/* We match if we have existing lock with same or wider set
-		   of bits. */
+		 * of bits.
+		 */
 		if (lock->l_resource->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS &&
 		     ((lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits &
 		      policy->l_inodebits.bits) !=
@@ -1515,7 +1529,8 @@ enum ldlm_error ldlm_lock_enqueue(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	if (lock->l_req_mode == lock->l_granted_mode) {
 		/* The server returned a blocked lock, but it was granted
 		 * before we got a chance to actually enqueue it.  We don't
-		 * need to do anything else. */
+		 * need to do anything else.
+		 */
 		*flags &= ~(LDLM_FL_BLOCK_GRANTED |
 			    LDLM_FL_BLOCK_CONV | LDLM_FL_BLOCK_WAIT);
 		goto out;
@@ -1528,7 +1543,8 @@ enum ldlm_error ldlm_lock_enqueue(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 		LBUG();
 
 	/* Some flags from the enqueue want to make it into the AST, via the
-	 * lock's l_flags. */
+	 * lock's l_flags.
+	 */
 	lock->l_flags |= *flags & LDLM_FL_AST_DISCARD_DATA;
 
 	/*
@@ -1609,14 +1625,16 @@ ldlm_work_cp_ast_lock(struct ptlrpc_request_set *rqset, void *opaq)
 	 * This can't happen with the blocking_ast, however, because we
 	 * will never call the local blocking_ast until we drop our
 	 * reader/writer reference, which we won't do until we get the
-	 * reply and finish enqueueing. */
+	 * reply and finish enqueueing.
+	 */
 
 	/* nobody should touch l_cp_ast */
 	lock_res_and_lock(lock);
 	list_del_init(&lock->l_cp_ast);
 	LASSERT(lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CP_REQD);
 	/* save l_completion_ast since it can be changed by
-	 * mds_intent_policy(), see bug 14225 */
+	 * mds_intent_policy(), see bug 14225
+	 */
 	completion_callback = lock->l_completion_ast;
 	lock->l_flags &= ~LDLM_FL_CP_REQD;
 	unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
@@ -1737,7 +1755,8 @@ int ldlm_run_ast_work(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct list_head *rpc_list,
 	/* We create a ptlrpc request set with flow control extension.
 	 * This request set will use the work_ast_lock function to produce new
 	 * requests and will send a new request each time one completes in order
-	 * to keep the number of requests in flight to ns_max_parallel_ast */
+	 * to keep the number of requests in flight to ns_max_parallel_ast
+	 */
 	arg->set = ptlrpc_prep_fcset(ns->ns_max_parallel_ast ? : UINT_MAX,
 				     work_ast_lock, arg);
 	if (!arg->set) {
@@ -1803,7 +1822,8 @@ void ldlm_lock_cancel(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 	ns  = ldlm_res_to_ns(res);
 
 	/* Please do not, no matter how tempting, remove this LBUG without
-	 * talking to me first. -phik */
+	 * talking to me first. -phik
+	 */
 	if (lock->l_readers || lock->l_writers) {
 		LDLM_ERROR(lock, "lock still has references");
 		LBUG();
@@ -1819,7 +1839,8 @@ void ldlm_lock_cancel(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 		ldlm_pool_del(&ns->ns_pool, lock);
 
 	/* Make sure we will not be called again for same lock what is possible
-	 * if not to zero out lock->l_granted_mode */
+	 * if not to zero out lock->l_granted_mode
+	 */
 	lock->l_granted_mode = LCK_MINMODE;
 	unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
 }
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
index 209db5d..ebe9042 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lockd.c
@@ -194,7 +194,8 @@ static void ldlm_handle_cp_callback(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 				goto out;
 			}
 		} else if (ldlm_has_layout(lock)) { /* for layout lock, lvb has
-						     * variable length */
+						     * variable length
+						     */
 			void *lvb_data;
 
 			lvb_data = kzalloc(lvb_len, GFP_NOFS);
@@ -224,7 +225,8 @@ static void ldlm_handle_cp_callback(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 	}
 
 	/* If we receive the completion AST before the actual enqueue returned,
-	 * then we might need to switch lock modes, resources, or extents. */
+	 * then we might need to switch lock modes, resources, or extents.
+	 */
 	if (dlm_req->lock_desc.l_granted_mode != lock->l_req_mode) {
 		lock->l_req_mode = dlm_req->lock_desc.l_granted_mode;
 		LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "completion AST, new lock mode");
@@ -256,7 +258,8 @@ static void ldlm_handle_cp_callback(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 	if (dlm_req->lock_flags & LDLM_FL_AST_SENT) {
 		/* BL_AST locks are not needed in LRU.
-		 * Let ldlm_cancel_lru() be fast. */
+		 * Let ldlm_cancel_lru() be fast.
+		 */
 		ldlm_lock_remove_from_lru(lock);
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_CBPENDING | LDLM_FL_BL_AST;
 		LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "completion AST includes blocking AST");
@@ -276,8 +279,7 @@ static void ldlm_handle_cp_callback(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 	LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "callback handler finished, about to run_ast_work");
 
-	/* Let Enqueue to call osc_lock_upcall() and initialize
-	 * l_ast_data */
+	/* Let Enqueue to call osc_lock_upcall() and initialize l_ast_data */
 	OBD_FAIL_TIMEOUT(OBD_FAIL_OSC_CP_ENQ_RACE, 2);
 
 	ldlm_run_ast_work(ns, &ast_list, LDLM_WORK_CP_AST);
@@ -371,7 +373,8 @@ static int __ldlm_bl_to_thread(struct ldlm_bl_work_item *blwi,
 	wake_up(&blp->blp_waitq);
 
 	/* can not check blwi->blwi_flags as blwi could be already freed in
-	   LCF_ASYNC mode */
+	 * LCF_ASYNC mode
+	 */
 	if (!(cancel_flags & LCF_ASYNC))
 		wait_for_completion(&blwi->blwi_comp);
 
@@ -541,7 +544,8 @@ static int ldlm_callback_handler(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 	/* Requests arrive in sender's byte order.  The ptlrpc service
 	 * handler has already checked and, if necessary, byte-swapped the
 	 * incoming request message body, but I am responsible for the
-	 * message buffers. */
+	 * message buffers.
+	 */
 
 	/* do nothing for sec context finalize */
 	if (lustre_msg_get_opc(req->rq_reqmsg) == SEC_CTX_FINI)
@@ -603,7 +607,8 @@ static int ldlm_callback_handler(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 	}
 
 	/* Force a known safe race, send a cancel to the server for a lock
-	 * which the server has already started a blocking callback on. */
+	 * which the server has already started a blocking callback on.
+	 */
 	if (OBD_FAIL_CHECK(OBD_FAIL_LDLM_CANCEL_BL_CB_RACE) &&
 	    lustre_msg_get_opc(req->rq_reqmsg) == LDLM_BL_CALLBACK) {
 		rc = ldlm_cli_cancel(&dlm_req->lock_handle[0], 0);
@@ -633,7 +638,8 @@ static int ldlm_callback_handler(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 		/* If somebody cancels lock and cache is already dropped,
 		 * or lock is failed before cp_ast received on client,
 		 * we can tell the server we have no lock. Otherwise, we
-		 * should send cancel after dropping the cache. */
+		 * should send cancel after dropping the cache.
+		 */
 		if (((lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CANCELING) &&
 		    (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_BL_DONE)) ||
 		    (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_FAILED)) {
@@ -647,7 +653,8 @@ static int ldlm_callback_handler(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 			return 0;
 		}
 		/* BL_AST locks are not needed in LRU.
-		 * Let ldlm_cancel_lru() be fast. */
+		 * Let ldlm_cancel_lru() be fast.
+		 */
 		ldlm_lock_remove_from_lru(lock);
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_BL_AST;
 	}
@@ -660,7 +667,8 @@ static int ldlm_callback_handler(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 	 * But we'd also like to be able to indicate in the reply that we're
 	 * cancelling right now, because it's unused, or have an intent result
 	 * in the reply, so we might have to push the responsibility for sending
-	 * the reply down into the AST handlers, alas. */
+	 * the reply down into the AST handlers, alas.
+	 */
 
 	switch (lustre_msg_get_opc(req->rq_reqmsg)) {
 	case LDLM_BL_CALLBACK:
@@ -809,7 +817,8 @@ static int ldlm_bl_thread_main(void *arg)
 			/* The special case when we cancel locks in LRU
 			 * asynchronously, we pass the list of locks here.
 			 * Thus locks are marked LDLM_FL_CANCELING, but NOT
-			 * canceled locally yet. */
+			 * canceled locally yet.
+			 */
 			count = ldlm_cli_cancel_list_local(&blwi->blwi_head,
 							   blwi->blwi_count,
 							   LCF_BL_AST);
@@ -1116,7 +1125,8 @@ void ldlm_exit(void)
 	kmem_cache_destroy(ldlm_resource_slab);
 	/* ldlm_lock_put() use RCU to call ldlm_lock_free, so need call
 	 * synchronize_rcu() to wait a grace period elapsed, so that
-	 * ldlm_lock_free() get a chance to be called. */
+	 * ldlm_lock_free() get a chance to be called.
+	 */
 	synchronize_rcu();
 	kmem_cache_destroy(ldlm_lock_slab);
 	kmem_cache_destroy(ldlm_interval_slab);
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
index 718e3c3..2d501a6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static int ldlm_expired_completion_wait(void *data)
 }
 
 /* We use the same basis for both server side and client side functions
-   from a single node. */
+ * from a single node.
+ */
 static int ldlm_get_enq_timeout(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 {
 	int timeout = at_get(ldlm_lock_to_ns_at(lock));
@@ -136,8 +137,9 @@ static int ldlm_get_enq_timeout(struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 	if (AT_OFF)
 		return obd_timeout / 2;
 	/* Since these are non-updating timeouts, we should be conservative.
-	   It would be nice to have some kind of "early reply" mechanism for
-	   lock callbacks too... */
+	 * It would be nice to have some kind of "early reply" mechanism for
+	 * lock callbacks too...
+	 */
 	timeout = min_t(int, at_max, timeout + (timeout >> 1)); /* 150% */
 	return max(timeout, ldlm_enqueue_min);
 }
@@ -243,8 +245,9 @@ noreproc:
 		imp = obd->u.cli.cl_import;
 
 	/* Wait a long time for enqueue - server may have to callback a
-	   lock from another client.  Server will evict the other client if it
-	   doesn't respond reasonably, and then give us the lock. */
+	 * lock from another client.  Server will evict the other client if it
+	 * doesn't respond reasonably, and then give us the lock.
+	 */
 	timeout = ldlm_get_enq_timeout(lock) * 2;
 
 	lwd.lwd_lock = lock;
@@ -296,7 +299,8 @@ static void failed_lock_cleanup(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	    !(lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_FAILED)) {
 		/* Make sure that this lock will not be found by raced
 		 * bl_ast and -EINVAL reply is sent to server anyways.
-		 * bug 17645 */
+		 * bug 17645
+		 */
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY | LDLM_FL_FAILED |
 				 LDLM_FL_ATOMIC_CB | LDLM_FL_CBPENDING;
 		need_cancel = 1;
@@ -312,11 +316,13 @@ static void failed_lock_cleanup(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	ldlm_lock_decref_internal(lock, mode);
 
 	/* XXX - HACK because we shouldn't call ldlm_lock_destroy()
-	 *       from llite/file.c/ll_file_flock(). */
+	 *       from llite/file.c/ll_file_flock().
+	 */
 	/* This code makes for the fact that we do not have blocking handler on
 	 * a client for flock locks. As such this is the place where we must
 	 * completely kill failed locks. (interrupted and those that
-	 * were waiting to be granted when server evicted us. */
+	 * were waiting to be granted when server evicted us.
+	 */
 	if (lock->l_resource->lr_type == LDLM_FLOCK) {
 		lock_res_and_lock(lock);
 		ldlm_resource_unlink_lock(lock);
@@ -402,7 +408,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 	/* Key change rehash lock in per-export hash with new key */
 	if (exp->exp_lock_hash) {
 		/* In the function below, .hs_keycmp resolves to
-		 * ldlm_export_lock_keycmp() */
+		 * ldlm_export_lock_keycmp()
+		 */
 		/* coverity[overrun-buffer-val] */
 		cfs_hash_rehash_key(exp->exp_lock_hash,
 				    &lock->l_remote_handle,
@@ -416,7 +423,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 	lock->l_flags |= ldlm_flags_from_wire(reply->lock_flags &
 					      LDLM_INHERIT_FLAGS);
 	/* move NO_TIMEOUT flag to the lock to force ldlm_lock_match()
-	 * to wait with no timeout as well */
+	 * to wait with no timeout as well
+	 */
 	lock->l_flags |= ldlm_flags_from_wire(reply->lock_flags &
 					      LDLM_FL_NO_TIMEOUT);
 	unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
@@ -426,7 +434,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 	/* If enqueue returned a blocked lock but the completion handler has
 	 * already run, then it fixed up the resource and we don't need to do it
-	 * again. */
+	 * again.
+	 */
 	if ((*flags) & LDLM_FL_LOCK_CHANGED) {
 		int newmode = reply->lock_desc.l_req_mode;
 
@@ -468,7 +477,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 	if ((*flags) & LDLM_FL_AST_SENT ||
 	    /* Cancel extent locks as soon as possible on a liblustre client,
 	     * because it cannot handle asynchronous ASTs robustly (see
-	     * bug 7311). */
+	     * bug 7311).
+	     */
 	    (LIBLUSTRE_CLIENT && type == LDLM_EXTENT)) {
 		lock_res_and_lock(lock);
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_CBPENDING |  LDLM_FL_BL_AST;
@@ -477,12 +487,14 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 	}
 
 	/* If the lock has already been granted by a completion AST, don't
-	 * clobber the LVB with an older one. */
+	 * clobber the LVB with an older one.
+	 */
 	if (lvb_len != 0) {
 		/* We must lock or a racing completion might update lvb without
 		 * letting us know and we'll clobber the correct value.
-		 * Cannot unlock after the check either, a that still leaves
-		 * a tiny window for completion to get in */
+		 * Cannot unlock after the check either, as that still leaves
+		 * a tiny window for completion to get in
+		 */
 		lock_res_and_lock(lock);
 		if (lock->l_req_mode != lock->l_granted_mode)
 			rc = ldlm_fill_lvb(lock, &req->rq_pill, RCL_SERVER,
@@ -508,7 +520,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 	if (lvb_len && lvb) {
 		/* Copy the LVB here, and not earlier, because the completion
-		 * AST (if any) can override what we got in the reply */
+		 * AST (if any) can override what we got in the reply
+		 */
 		memcpy(lvb, lock->l_lvb_data, lvb_len);
 	}
 
@@ -594,7 +607,8 @@ int ldlm_prep_elc_req(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 		/* Cancel LRU locks here _only_ if the server supports
 		 * EARLY_CANCEL. Otherwise we have to send extra CANCEL
-		 * RPC, which will make us slower. */
+		 * RPC, which will make us slower.
+		 */
 		if (avail > count)
 			count += ldlm_cancel_lru_local(ns, cancels, to_free,
 						       avail - count, 0, flags);
@@ -619,7 +633,8 @@ int ldlm_prep_elc_req(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 			/* Skip first lock handler in ldlm_request_pack(),
 			 * this method will increment @lock_count according
 			 * to the lock handle amount actually written to
-			 * the buffer. */
+			 * the buffer.
+			 */
 			dlm->lock_count = canceloff;
 		}
 		/* Pack into the request @pack lock handles. */
@@ -669,7 +684,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request **reqp,
 	ns = exp->exp_obd->obd_namespace;
 
 	/* If we're replaying this lock, just check some invariants.
-	 * If we're creating a new lock, get everything all setup nice. */
+	 * If we're creating a new lock, get everything all setup nicely.
+	 */
 	if (is_replay) {
 		lock = ldlm_handle2lock_long(lockh, 0);
 		LASSERT(lock);
@@ -766,7 +782,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_enqueue(struct obd_export *exp, struct ptlrpc_request **reqp,
 				    lockh, rc);
 
 	/* If ldlm_cli_enqueue_fini did not find the lock, we need to free
-	 * one reference that we took */
+	 * one reference that we took
+	 */
 	if (err == -ENOLCK)
 		LDLM_LOCK_RELEASE(lock);
 	else
@@ -842,7 +859,8 @@ static void ldlm_cancel_pack(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 	/* XXX: it would be better to pack lock handles grouped by resource.
 	 * so that the server cancel would call filter_lvbo_update() less
-	 * frequently. */
+	 * frequently.
+	 */
 	list_for_each_entry(lock, head, l_bl_ast) {
 		if (!count--)
 			break;
@@ -857,7 +875,8 @@ static void ldlm_cancel_pack(struct ptlrpc_request *req,
 
 /**
  * Prepare and send a batched cancel RPC. It will include \a count lock
- * handles of locks given in \a cancels list. */
+ * handles of locks given in \a cancels list.
+ */
 static int ldlm_cli_cancel_req(struct obd_export *exp,
 			       struct list_head *cancels,
 			       int count, enum ldlm_cancel_flags flags)
@@ -969,7 +988,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_update_pool(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 	 * is the case when server does not support LRU resize feature.
 	 * This is also possible in some recovery cases when server-side
 	 * reqs have no reference to the OBD export and thus access to
-	 * server-side namespace is not possible. */
+	 * server-side namespace is not possible.
+	 */
 	if (lustre_msg_get_slv(req->rq_repmsg) == 0 ||
 	    lustre_msg_get_limit(req->rq_repmsg) == 0) {
 		DEBUG_REQ(D_HA, req,
@@ -987,7 +1007,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_update_pool(struct ptlrpc_request *req)
 	 * to the pool thread. We do not access obd_namespace and pool
 	 * directly here as there is no reliable way to make sure that
 	 * they are still alive at cleanup time. Evil races are possible
-	 * which may cause Oops at that time. */
+	 * which may cause Oops at that time.
+	 */
 	write_lock(&obd->obd_pool_lock);
 	obd->obd_pool_slv = new_slv;
 	obd->obd_pool_limit = new_limit;
@@ -1026,7 +1047,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_cancel(struct lustre_handle *lockh,
 	}
 	/* Even if the lock is marked as LDLM_FL_BL_AST, this is a LDLM_CANCEL
 	 * RPC which goes to canceld portal, so we can cancel other LRU locks
-	 * here and send them all as one LDLM_CANCEL RPC. */
+	 * here and send them all as one LDLM_CANCEL RPC.
+	 */
 	LASSERT(list_empty(&lock->l_bl_ast));
 	list_add(&lock->l_bl_ast, &cancels);
 
@@ -1074,7 +1096,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_cancel_list_local(struct list_head *cancels, int count,
 		/* Until we have compound requests and can send LDLM_CANCEL
 		 * requests batched with generic RPCs, we need to send cancels
 		 * with the LDLM_FL_BL_AST flag in a separate RPC from
-		 * the one being generated now. */
+		 * the one being generated now.
+		 */
 		if (!(flags & LCF_BL_AST) && (rc == LDLM_FL_BL_AST)) {
 			LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "Cancel lock separately");
 			list_del_init(&lock->l_bl_ast);
@@ -1114,7 +1137,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	lock_res_and_lock(lock);
 
 	/* don't check added & count since we want to process all locks
-	 * from unused list */
+	 * from unused list
+	 */
 	switch (lock->l_resource->lr_type) {
 	case LDLM_EXTENT:
 	case LDLM_IBITS:
@@ -1150,7 +1174,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_lrur_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	unsigned long la;
 
 	/* Stop LRU processing when we reach past @count or have checked all
-	 * locks in LRU. */
+	 * locks in LRU.
+	 */
 	if (count && added >= count)
 		return LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK;
 
@@ -1164,7 +1189,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_lrur_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	ldlm_pool_set_clv(pl, lv);
 
 	/* Stop when SLV is not yet come from server or lv is smaller than
-	 * it is. */
+	 * it is.
+	 */
 	return (slv == 0 || lv < slv) ?
 		LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK : LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
 }
@@ -1184,7 +1210,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_passed_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 						   int count)
 {
 	/* Stop LRU processing when we reach past @count or have checked all
-	 * locks in LRU. */
+	 * locks in LRU.
+	 */
 	return (added >= count) ?
 		LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK : LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
 }
@@ -1225,7 +1252,8 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_default_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 						    int count)
 {
 	/* Stop LRU processing when we reach past count or have checked all
-	 * locks in LRU. */
+	 * locks in LRU.
+	 */
 	return (added >= count) ?
 		LDLM_POLICY_KEEP_LOCK : LDLM_POLICY_CANCEL_LOCK;
 }
@@ -1329,7 +1357,8 @@ static int ldlm_prepare_lru_list(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 				continue;
 
 			/* Somebody is already doing CANCEL. No need for this
-			 * lock in LRU, do not traverse it again. */
+			 * lock in LRU, do not traverse it again.
+			 */
 			if (!(lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CANCELING))
 				break;
 
@@ -1378,7 +1407,8 @@ static int ldlm_prepare_lru_list(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 			/* Another thread is removing lock from LRU, or
 			 * somebody is already doing CANCEL, or there
 			 * is a blocking request which will send cancel
-			 * by itself, or the lock is no longer unused. */
+			 * by itself, or the lock is no longer unused.
+			 */
 			unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
 			lu_ref_del(&lock->l_reference,
 				   __func__, current);
@@ -1392,7 +1422,8 @@ static int ldlm_prepare_lru_list(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 		 * better send cancel notification to server, so that it
 		 * frees appropriate state. This might lead to a race
 		 * where while we are doing cancel here, server is also
-		 * silently cancelling this lock. */
+		 * silently cancelling this lock.
+		 */
 		lock->l_flags &= ~LDLM_FL_CANCEL_ON_BLOCK;
 
 		/* Setting the CBPENDING flag is a little misleading,
@@ -1400,7 +1431,8 @@ static int ldlm_prepare_lru_list(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 		 * CBPENDING is set, the lock can accumulate no more
 		 * readers/writers. Since readers and writers are
 		 * already zero here, ldlm_lock_decref() won't see
-		 * this flag and call l_blocking_ast */
+		 * this flag and call l_blocking_ast
+		 */
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_CBPENDING | LDLM_FL_CANCELING;
 
 		/* We can't re-add to l_lru as it confuses the
@@ -1408,7 +1440,8 @@ static int ldlm_prepare_lru_list(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 		 * arrives after we drop lr_lock below. We use l_bl_ast
 		 * and can't use l_pending_chain as it is used both on
 		 * server and client nevertheless bug 5666 says it is
-		 * used only on server */
+		 * used only on server
+		 */
 		LASSERT(list_empty(&lock->l_bl_ast));
 		list_add(&lock->l_bl_ast, cancels);
 		unlock_res_and_lock(lock);
@@ -1449,7 +1482,8 @@ int ldlm_cancel_lru(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, int nr,
 	int count, rc;
 
 	/* Just prepare the list of locks, do not actually cancel them yet.
-	 * Locks are cancelled later in a separate thread. */
+	 * Locks are cancelled later in a separate thread.
+	 */
 	count = ldlm_prepare_lru_list(ns, &cancels, nr, 0, flags);
 	rc = ldlm_bl_to_thread_list(ns, NULL, &cancels, count, cancel_flags);
 	if (rc == 0)
@@ -1485,7 +1519,8 @@ int ldlm_cancel_resource_local(struct ldlm_resource *res,
 			continue;
 
 		/* If somebody is already doing CANCEL, or blocking AST came,
-		 * skip this lock. */
+		 * skip this lock.
+		 */
 		if (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_BL_AST ||
 		    lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CANCELING)
 			continue;
@@ -1494,7 +1529,8 @@ int ldlm_cancel_resource_local(struct ldlm_resource *res,
 			continue;
 
 		/* If policy is given and this is IBITS lock, add to list only
-		 * those locks that match by policy. */
+		 * those locks that match by policy.
+		 */
 		if (policy && (lock->l_resource->lr_type == LDLM_IBITS) &&
 		    !(lock->l_policy_data.l_inodebits.bits &
 		      policy->l_inodebits.bits))
@@ -1539,7 +1575,8 @@ int ldlm_cli_cancel_list(struct list_head *cancels, int count,
 	 * Usually it is enough to have just 1 RPC, but it is possible that
 	 * there are too many locks to be cancelled in LRU or on a resource.
 	 * It would also speed up the case when the server does not support
-	 * the feature. */
+	 * the feature.
+	 */
 	while (count > 0) {
 		LASSERT(!list_empty(cancels));
 		lock = list_entry(cancels->next, struct ldlm_lock,
@@ -1577,7 +1614,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(ldlm_cli_cancel_list);
  * Cancel all locks on a resource that have 0 readers/writers.
  *
  * If flags & LDLM_FL_LOCAL_ONLY, throw the locks away without trying
- * to notify the server. */
+ * to notify the server.
+ */
 int ldlm_cli_cancel_unused_resource(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 				    const struct ldlm_res_id *res_id,
 				    ldlm_policy_data_t *policy,
@@ -1815,7 +1853,8 @@ static int replay_lock_interpret(const struct lu_env *env,
 	exp = req->rq_export;
 	if (exp && exp->exp_lock_hash) {
 		/* In the function below, .hs_keycmp resolves to
-		 * ldlm_export_lock_keycmp() */
+		 * ldlm_export_lock_keycmp()
+		 */
 		/* coverity[overrun-buffer-val] */
 		cfs_hash_rehash_key(exp->exp_lock_hash,
 				    &lock->l_remote_handle,
@@ -1850,7 +1889,8 @@ static int replay_one_lock(struct obd_import *imp, struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 
 	/* If this is reply-less callback lock, we cannot replay it, since
 	 * server might have long dropped it, but notification of that event was
-	 * lost by network. (and server granted conflicting lock already) */
+	 * lost by network. (and server granted conflicting lock already)
+	 */
 	if (lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CANCEL_ON_BLOCK) {
 		LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "Not replaying reply-less lock:");
 		ldlm_lock_cancel(lock);
@@ -1901,7 +1941,8 @@ static int replay_one_lock(struct obd_import *imp, struct ldlm_lock *lock)
 	/* notify the server we've replayed all requests.
 	 * also, we mark the request to be put on a dedicated
 	 * queue to be processed after all request replayes.
-	 * bug 6063 */
+	 * bug 6063
+	 */
 	lustre_msg_set_flags(req->rq_reqmsg, MSG_REQ_REPLAY_DONE);
 
 	LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "replaying lock:");
@@ -1936,7 +1977,8 @@ static void ldlm_cancel_unused_locks_for_replay(struct ldlm_namespace *ns)
 
 	/* We don't need to care whether or not LRU resize is enabled
 	 * because the LDLM_CANCEL_NO_WAIT policy doesn't use the
-	 * count parameter */
+	 * count parameter
+	 */
 	canceled = ldlm_cancel_lru_local(ns, &cancels, ns->ns_nr_unused, 0,
 					 LCF_LOCAL, LDLM_CANCEL_NO_WAIT);
 
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c
index 9ab4452..03b9726 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_resource.c
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ LIST_HEAD(ldlm_srv_namespace_list);
 struct mutex ldlm_cli_namespace_lock;
 /* Client Namespaces that have active resources in them.
  * Once all resources go away, ldlm_poold moves such namespaces to the
- * inactive list */
+ * inactive list
+ */
 LIST_HEAD(ldlm_cli_active_namespace_list);
 /* Client namespaces that don't have any locks in them */
 static LIST_HEAD(ldlm_cli_inactive_namespace_list);
@@ -66,7 +67,8 @@ static struct dentry *ldlm_ns_debugfs_dir;
 struct dentry *ldlm_svc_debugfs_dir;
 
 /* during debug dump certain amount of granted locks for one resource to avoid
- * DDOS. */
+ * DDOS.
+ */
 static unsigned int ldlm_dump_granted_max = 256;
 
 static ssize_t
@@ -275,7 +277,8 @@ static ssize_t lru_size_store(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr,
 		ldlm_cancel_lru(ns, 0, LCF_ASYNC, LDLM_CANCEL_PASSED);
 
 		/* Make sure that LRU resize was originally supported before
-		 * turning it on here. */
+		 * turning it on here.
+		 */
 		if (lru_resize &&
 		    (ns->ns_orig_connect_flags & OBD_CONNECT_LRU_RESIZE)) {
 			CDEBUG(D_DLMTRACE,
@@ -749,7 +752,8 @@ static void cleanup_resource(struct ldlm_resource *res, struct list_head *q,
 		struct lustre_handle lockh;
 
 		/* First, we look for non-cleaned-yet lock
-		 * all cleaned locks are marked by CLEANED flag. */
+		 * all cleaned locks are marked by CLEANED flag.
+		 */
 		lock_res(res);
 		list_for_each(tmp, q) {
 			lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock,
@@ -769,7 +773,8 @@ static void cleanup_resource(struct ldlm_resource *res, struct list_head *q,
 		}
 
 		/* Set CBPENDING so nothing in the cancellation path
-		 * can match this lock. */
+		 * can match this lock.
+		 */
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_CBPENDING;
 		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_FAILED;
 		lock->l_flags |= flags;
@@ -782,7 +787,8 @@ static void cleanup_resource(struct ldlm_resource *res, struct list_head *q,
 			/* This is a little bit gross, but much better than the
 			 * alternative: pretend that we got a blocking AST from
 			 * the server, so that when the lock is decref'd, it
-			 * will go away ... */
+			 * will go away ...
+			 */
 			unlock_res(res);
 			LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "setting FL_LOCAL_ONLY");
 			if (lock->l_completion_ast)
@@ -873,7 +879,8 @@ force_wait:
 				  atomic_read(&ns->ns_bref) == 0, &lwi);
 
 		/* Forced cleanups should be able to reclaim all references,
-		 * so it's safe to wait forever... we can't leak locks... */
+		 * so it's safe to wait forever... we can't leak locks...
+		 */
 		if (force && rc == -ETIMEDOUT) {
 			LCONSOLE_ERROR("Forced cleanup waiting for %s namespace with %d resources in use, (rc=%d)\n",
 				       ldlm_ns_name(ns),
@@ -943,7 +950,8 @@ static void ldlm_namespace_unregister(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	LASSERT(!list_empty(&ns->ns_list_chain));
 	/* Some asserts and possibly other parts of the code are still
 	 * using list_empty(&ns->ns_list_chain). This is why it is
-	 * important to use list_del_init() here. */
+	 * important to use list_del_init() here.
+	 */
 	list_del_init(&ns->ns_list_chain);
 	ldlm_namespace_nr_dec(client);
 	mutex_unlock(ldlm_namespace_lock(client));
@@ -963,7 +971,8 @@ void ldlm_namespace_free_post(struct ldlm_namespace *ns)
 	ldlm_namespace_unregister(ns, ns->ns_client);
 	/* Fini pool _before_ parent proc dir is removed. This is important as
 	 * ldlm_pool_fini() removes own proc dir which is child to @dir.
-	 * Removing it after @dir may cause oops. */
+	 * Removing it after @dir may cause oops.
+	 */
 	ldlm_pool_fini(&ns->ns_pool);
 
 	ldlm_namespace_debugfs_unregister(ns);
@@ -971,7 +980,8 @@ void ldlm_namespace_free_post(struct ldlm_namespace *ns)
 	cfs_hash_putref(ns->ns_rs_hash);
 	/* Namespace \a ns should be not on list at this time, otherwise
 	 * this will cause issues related to using freed \a ns in poold
-	 * thread. */
+	 * thread.
+	 */
 	LASSERT(list_empty(&ns->ns_list_chain));
 	kfree(ns);
 	ldlm_put_ref();
@@ -1050,7 +1060,8 @@ static struct ldlm_resource *ldlm_resource_new(void)
 	lu_ref_init(&res->lr_reference);
 
 	/* The creator of the resource must unlock the mutex after LVB
-	 * initialization. */
+	 * initialization.
+	 */
 	mutex_init(&res->lr_lvb_mutex);
 	mutex_lock(&res->lr_lvb_mutex);
 
@@ -1166,7 +1177,8 @@ ldlm_resource_get(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_resource *parent,
 	/* Let's see if we happened to be the very first resource in this
 	 * namespace. If so, and this is a client namespace, we need to move
 	 * the namespace into the active namespaces list to be patrolled by
-	 * the ldlm_poold. */
+	 * the ldlm_poold.
+	 */
 	if (ns_refcount == 1) {
 		mutex_lock(ldlm_namespace_lock(LDLM_NAMESPACE_CLIENT));
 		ldlm_namespace_move_to_active_locked(ns, LDLM_NAMESPACE_CLIENT);
-- 
2.1.0



More information about the lustre-devel mailing list