[lustre-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] staging: lustre: update modinfo data
Simmons, James A.
simmonsja at ornl.gov
Fri Feb 26 07:46:02 PST 2016
>On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 06:11:07AM +0000, Drokin, Oleg wrote:
>> On Feb 26, 2016, at 1:03 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 08:07:06PM -0500, James Simmons wrote:
>> >> The module information for Lustre is stale or in some cases
>> >> completely missing. This collection of patches brings the
>> >> modinfo up to date as well as filling in any missing information.
>> >> This patch set has been redone to rebase it on Oleg's latest
>> >> patch set to avoid collisons in merging.
>> >> Andreas Dilger (4):
>> >> staging: lustre: add missing MODULE_AUTHOR for LNet selftest module
>> >> staging: lustre: update the MODULE_DESCRIPTION for all lustre modules
>> >> staging: lustre: make module_init/exit naming consistent
>> >> staging: lustre: update comment for lnet_lib_init/exit
>> >> James Simmons (2):
>> >> staging: lustre: move module info to end of libcfs module.c file
>> >> staging: lustre: update the MODULE_VERSION for all lustre modules
>> > What changed to need a v2 of this series?
>> > Please ALWAYS say what the difference is, don't expect us to "just
>> > know".
>> > Please send a v3 of this, describing the changes, in the correct format,
>> > in each patch. You know better than this…
>> I think it says above that the rebase was done on top of my patchset
>> to resolve the conflict that arose?
>Where? Ugh, yeah, kind of, but where is the big v2: marking or some
>such thing like is required? It's very easy to miss this (as I did.)
>Please make it easy for maintainers, not hard on them...
Sorry, in the future I will add a ChangeLog section for newer versions of patches.
The good news is the patches from Oleg's that conflicted landed already which
means the this patch set is ready to land.
More information about the lustre-devel