[lustre-devel] [PATCH 06/12] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps

Deepa Dinamani deepa.kernel at gmail.com
Sat Apr 8 10:58:05 PDT 2017

> I have no problem merging this patch into audit/next for v4.12, would
> you prefer me to do that so at least this patch is merged?

This would be fine.
But, I think whoever takes the last 2 deletion patches should also take them.
I'm not sure how that part works out.

> It would probably make life a small bit easier for us in the audit
> world too as it would reduce the potential merge conflict.  However,
> that's a relatively small thing to worry about.


More information about the lustre-devel mailing list