[lustre-devel] (no subject)
James Simmons
jsimmons at infradead.org
Mon Jan 16 13:02:10 PST 2017
> Sounds good to me. Ideally, lnetctl should be able to do everything
> that lctl could do (plus all of the new features). Has it reached
> parity? If not, what else still remains to be done?
No lctl pings and the peer and connection handling is missing. I did
some work to support the missing features in lnetctl and combined with
multi-rail should fill in the gaps. Also we are missing lnetctl ping
but I think multi-rail might fix that. Not 100% sure tho.
>
> Chris
>
> On 01/10/2017 12:15 PM, Amir Shehata wrote:
> > lctl usage is kept for backwards compatibility. Eventually, we should be
> > moving to using lnetctl exclusively. Which lustre-release we should do
> > that in, is the question. 2.10?
> >
> > thanks
> > amir
> >
> > On 4 January 2017 at 16:16, Di Natale, Giuseppe <dinatale2 at llnl.gov
> > <mailto:dinatale2 at llnl.gov>> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > I am attempting to port the SysV lnet script as part of a transition
> > to systemd. I ran into the following in lustre/scripts/lnet:
> >
> > if [ -x $LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY -a -f
> > "$LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_FILE" ]; then
> > $LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY lnet configure || exit 1
> > else
> > lctl network up || exit 1
> > fi
> >
> > Can the check for LUSTRE_LNET_CONFIG_UTILITY (/usr/sbin/lnetctl by
> > default) be removed so that way lnetctl is used exclusively?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Giuseppe Di Natale
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lustre-devel mailing list
> > lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org <mailto:lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org>
> > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
> > <http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > lustre-devel mailing list
> > lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> lustre-devel mailing list
> lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
>
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list