[lustre-devel] [PATCH 0/9] Assorted cleanups for staging/.../lustre/ldlm/ldlm_flock.c

NeilBrown neilb at suse.com
Wed Oct 25 14:55:06 PDT 2017

On Tue, Oct 24 2017, James Simmons wrote:

>> This file contains quite a bit of dead code and unused variables.
>> This patch series cleans it up in various ways.
>> It should change behaviour at all, just code
>> readability/maintainabilty.
>> I sent the back in July but got not response, possibly because there
>> were included with other patches which caused a distraction.
>> So here they are by themselves.
> Thanks for separating them out. I will give them a spin.

Thanks.  I have a growing series of cleanups (43 at present, including
these and the namei/dcache patches).  Is posting them here the best
approach?  I assume I should keep them in well-defined groups.  Should I
wait for one set to be merged before sending more, or should I just send
them when I think they are ready and you (or others) will look at them
as time permits.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20171026/38e34cca/attachment.sig>

More information about the lustre-devel mailing list