[lustre-devel] [PATCH 18/22] lustre: net_fault: convert list_for_each_entry_safe() to while(!list_empty())
James Simmons
jsimmons at infradead.org
Wed Aug 1 20:09:09 PDT 2018
> These loops are removing all elements from a list.
> So using while(!list_empty()) makes the intent clearer.
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons at infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c
> index cb1f9053ef48..41d6131ee15a 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/net_fault.c
> @@ -216,7 +216,8 @@ lnet_drop_rule_del(lnet_nid_t src, lnet_nid_t dst)
> }
> lnet_net_unlock(LNET_LOCK_EX);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, tmp, &zombies, dr_link) {
> + while (!list_empty(&zombies)) {
> + rule = list_first_entry(&zombies, struct lnet_drop_rule, dr_link);
> CDEBUG(D_NET, "Remove drop rule: src %s->dst: %s (1/%d, %d)\n",
> libcfs_nid2str(rule->dr_attr.fa_src),
> libcfs_nid2str(rule->dr_attr.fa_dst),
> @@ -841,7 +842,9 @@ lnet_delay_rule_del(lnet_nid_t src, lnet_nid_t dst, bool shutdown)
> !list_empty(&rule_list);
> lnet_net_unlock(LNET_LOCK_EX);
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(rule, tmp, &rule_list, dl_link) {
> + while (!list_empty(&rule_list)) {
> + rule = list_first_entry(&rule_list,
> + struct lnet_delay_rule, dl_link);
> list_del_init(&rule->dl_link);
>
> del_timer_sync(&rule->dl_timer);
>
>
>
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list