[lustre-devel] [PATCH 17/22] lustre: lib-move: convert list_for_each_entry_safe() to while(!list_empty())

[NeilBrown]

These loops are removing all elements from a list.
So using while(!list_empty()) makes the intent clearer.

Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com>
---
 drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c
index 2756e91b34bb..19cab374b6bc 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/lnet/lib-move.c
@@ -853,7 +853,6 @@ lnet_drop_routed_msgs_locked(struct list_head *list, int cpt)
 {
 	struct list_head drop;
 	struct lnet_msg *msg;
-	struct lnet_msg *tmp;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drop);
 
@@ -861,7 +860,8 @@ lnet_drop_routed_msgs_locked(struct list_head *list, int cpt)
 
 	lnet_net_unlock(cpt);
 
-	list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, tmp, &drop, msg_list) {
+	while(!list_empty(&drop)) {
+		msg = list_first_entry(&drop, struct lnet_msg, msg_list);
 		lnet_ni_recv(msg->msg_rxpeer->lp_ni, msg->msg_private, NULL,
 			     0, 0, 0, msg->msg_hdr.payload_length);
 		list_del_init(&msg->msg_list);