[lustre-devel] [PATCH v3] staging: lustre: Change return type to vm_fault_t

[NeilBrown]

On Thu, Jun 14 2018, Souptick Joarder wrote:

> On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 12:59 PM, NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 12 2018, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>>
>>> On 12-Jun-2018 2:21 AM, "Greg KH" <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 02:00:47AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
>>>> > On Mon, May 21, 2018 at 11:39 PM, Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux at gmail.com>
>>>> >
>>>> > If no further comment, we would like to get this patch in 4.18-rc-X.
>>>>
>>>> Why?  Is it a regression fix?  That's all that is allowed after -rc1.
>>>
>>> No, this is not regression fix. We need to get this into 4.18-rc-1.  But
>>> mostly it can't make into linus tree in rc-1 :)
>>>>
>>>> And have you tried applying it to Linus's current tree?  :)
>>>
>>> Last tested on 4.17-rc-6 and it worked fine. Let me verify in current tree.
>>>
>>
>> As you have undoubtedly noticed, lustre is no longer in Linus' tree.
>> I'm experimenting with maintaining a branch which retains the code
>> (lustre/* in github.com/neilbrown/linux) so we can get it ready for
>> merging properly.
>> I've added you patch to my tree.
>
> You need to add this patch in your tree as well.
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?h=next-20180614&id=1c8f422059ae5da07db7406ab916203f9417e396
>
> This patch appears to be missing in your github branch.
??
That patch is in 4.17-rc1 (v4.17-rc1~99^2~6) and my lustre trees are
based on 4.17 (at least).  My 'master' might be a bit behind - maybe
that confused you.

Thanks,
NeilBrown
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 832 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20180615/de7952d1/attachment.sig>