[lustre-devel] [PATCH] staging: lustre: o2iblnd: Fix crash in kiblnd_handle_early_rxs()
Doug Oucharek
doucharek at cray.com
Thu May 10 19:30:25 PDT 2018
I did a v2 of this patch already.
Changing to the safe version of the list macros is a mixed bag.
Doug
On May 10, 2018, at 5:53 PM, NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com<mailto:neilb at suse.com>> wrote:
On Wed, May 09 2018, Doug Oucharek wrote:
Under upstream staging commit 5a2ca43fa54f561c252c2, the list handling
code in kiblnd_handle_early_rxs() got changed to list_for_each_safe().
That protects against the current thread from deleting the current entry
it is looking at. It does not protect against another thread from deleting
the next item in the list (which the tmp variable points to). The way this
routine holds then releases a lock opens the door to other threads doing
just that.
This patch reverts this commit on this routine.
Intel-bug-id: https://jira.hpdd.intel.com/browse/LU-9886
Signed-off-by: Doug Oucharek <dougso at me.com<mailto:dougso at me.com>>
---
drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
index 32fa8ca..6148fbb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lnet/klnds/o2iblnd/o2iblnd_cb.c
@@ -1965,13 +1965,14 @@ static int kiblnd_resolve_addr(struct rdma_cm_id *cmid,
{
unsigned long flags;
struct kib_rx *rx;
- struct kib_rx *tmp;
LASSERT(!in_interrupt());
LASSERT(conn->ibc_state >= IBLND_CONN_ESTABLISHED);
write_lock_irqsave(&kiblnd_data.kib_global_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry_safe(rx, tmp, &conn->ibc_early_rxs, rx_list) {
+ while (!list_empty(&conn->ibc_early_rxs)) {
+ rx = list_entry(conn->ibc_early_rxs.next,
+ kib_rx_t, rx_list);
Should be:
struct kib_tx
Otherwise,
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com<mailto:neilb at suse.com>>
Those "convert lots of list_for_each" things really do need
careful review, don't they :-(
Thanks,
NeilBrown
list_del(&rx->rx_list);
write_unlock_irqrestore(&kiblnd_data.kib_global_lock, flags);
--
1.8.3.1
_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-devel mailing list
lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-devel at lists.lustre.org>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-devel-lustre.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-devel-lustre.org/attachments/20180511/182ae981/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list