[lustre-devel] [PATCH 6/9] lustre: obdclass: health_check to report unhealthy upon LBUG
James Simmons
jsimmons at infradead.org
Sun Nov 25 17:46:42 PST 2018
> From: Bruno Faccini <bruno.faccini at intel.com>
>
> When a LBUG has occurred, without panic_on_lbug being set, health_check
> /proc file must return an unhealthy state.
I pushed this one to Greg which was disliked since it breaks the one item
per sysfs rule. See
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/755571
I did start a proper port to sysfs at
https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/25631
but it needs to be updated. I do like Andreas idea of a sysfs and debugfs
file since lctl get_param will return the results from both together.
We could land it as is and update the sysfs handling at a latter date
(shouldn't be too far down the road). Here is my review in case you want
to land it.
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons at infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bruno Faccini <bruno.faccini at intel.com>
> WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-7486
> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/17981
> Reviewed-by: Bobi Jam <bobijam at hotmail.com>
> Reviewed-by: Niu Yawei <yawei.niu at intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: James Simmons <uja.ornl at yahoo.com>
> Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb at suse.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_sysfs.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_sysfs.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_sysfs.c
> index 6669c235dd51..5fd30a8e2b44 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/obdclass/obd_sysfs.c
> @@ -173,8 +173,10 @@ health_check_show(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, char *buf)
> int i;
> size_t len = 0;
>
> - if (libcfs_catastrophe)
> + if (libcfs_catastrophe) {
> return sprintf(buf, "LBUG\n");
> + healthy = false;
> + }
>
> read_lock(&obd_dev_lock);
> for (i = 0; i < class_devno_max(); i++) {
>
>
>
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list