[lustre-devel] Do we need LOOKUP_CONTINUE in ll_revalidate_dentry()
James Simmons
jsimmons at infradead.org
Mon Nov 26 11:51:16 PST 2018
> On Mon, Nov 26 2018, James Simmons wrote:
>
> > Doing a compare to the OpenSFS branch I noticed this difference:
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dcache.c
> > b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dcache.c
> > index 11b82c63..6ee0ec9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dcache.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/dcache.c
> > @@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ static int ll_revalidate_dentry(struct dentry *dentry,
> > * to this dentry, then its lock has not been revoked and the
> > * path component is valid.
> > */
> > - if (lookup_flags & LOOKUP_PARENT)
> > + if (lookup_flags & (LOOKUP_CONTINUE | LOOKUP_PARENT))
> > return 1;
> >
> > /* Symlink - always valid as long as the dentry was found */
> >
> > Is that needed for newer kernels?
>
> LOOKUP_CONTINUE disappeared in 2011
>
> Commit: 49084c3bb205 ("kill LOOKUP_CONTINUE")
>
> LOOKUP_PARENT is the new LOOKUP_CONTINUE.
So its really
if (lookup_flags & (LOOKUP_PARENT | LOOKUP_PARENT))
return 1;
in OpenSFS branch :-/
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list