[lustre-devel] [PATCH 08/15] lustre: mdt: New connect flag for non-open-by-fid lock request
James Simmons
jsimmons at infradead.org
Wed Jul 7 12:11:09 PDT 2021
From: Oleg Drokin <green at whamcloud.com>
While we removed the 2.1 check for open by fid when open
lock is requested, when you talk to old servers that don't
have that patch - they get an open error, so introduce a compat
flag.
Fixes: c9e0538f2b ("lustre: llite: Introduce inode open heat counter")
WC-bug-id: https://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/LU-10948
Lustre-commit: 72c9a6e5fb6e11fca ("LU-10948 mdt: New connect flag for non-open-by-fid lock request")
Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green at whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/43907
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger at whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: James Nunez <jnunez at whamcloud.com>
Signed-off-by: James Simmons <jsimmons at infradead.org>
---
fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c | 3 ++-
fs/lustre/llite/namei.c | 4 +++-
fs/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c | 6 ++++++
fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c | 2 ++
include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h | 1 +
5 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c b/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
index 646bff8..b131edd 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/llite/llite_lib.c
@@ -316,7 +316,8 @@ static int client_common_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, char *md, char *dt)
OBD_CONNECT2_CRUSH | OBD_CONNECT2_LSEEK |
OBD_CONNECT2_GETATTR_PFID |
OBD_CONNECT2_DOM_LVB |
- OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS;
+ OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS |
+ OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK;
if (sbi->ll_flags & LL_SBI_LRU_RESIZE)
data->ocd_connect_flags |= OBD_CONNECT_LRU_RESIZE;
diff --git a/fs/lustre/llite/namei.c b/fs/lustre/llite/namei.c
index f42e872..f32aa14 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/llite/namei.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/llite/namei.c
@@ -1145,7 +1145,9 @@ static int ll_atomic_open(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry,
* we only need to request open lock if it was requested
* for every open
*/
- if (ll_i2sbi(dir)->ll_oc_thrsh_count == 1)
+ if (ll_i2sbi(dir)->ll_oc_thrsh_count == 1 &&
+ exp_connect_flags2(ll_i2mdexp(dir)) &
+ OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK)
it->it_flags |= MDS_OPEN_LOCK;
/* Dentry added to dcache tree in ll_lookup_it */
diff --git a/fs/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c b/fs/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
index 0cad91d..db809f3 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/obdclass/lprocfs_status.c
@@ -131,6 +131,12 @@
"lseek", /* 0x40000 */
"dom_lvb", /* 0x80000 */
"reply_mbits", /* 0x100000 */
+ "mode_convert", /* 0x200000 */
+ "batch_rpc", /* 0x400000 */
+ "pcc_ro", /* 0x800000 */
+ "mne_nid_type", /* 0x1000000 */
+ "lock_contend", /* 0x2000000 */
+ "atomic_open_lock", /* 0x4000000 */
NULL
};
diff --git a/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c b/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
index db97748..9e0eaa7 100644
--- a/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
+++ b/fs/lustre/ptlrpc/wiretest.c
@@ -1252,6 +1252,8 @@ void lustre_assert_wire_constants(void)
OBD_CONNECT2_DOM_LVB);
LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS == 0x100000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS);
+ LASSERTF(OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK == 0x4000000ULL, "found 0x%.16llxULL\n",
+ OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK);
LASSERTF(OBD_CKSUM_CRC32 == 0x00000001UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
(unsigned int)OBD_CKSUM_CRC32);
LASSERTF(OBD_CKSUM_ADLER == 0x00000002UL, "found 0x%.8xUL\n",
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h b/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h
index 813e4fc..68bb807 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/lustre/lustre_idl.h
@@ -840,6 +840,7 @@ struct ptlrpc_body_v2 {
#define OBD_CONNECT2_LSEEK 0x40000ULL /* SEEK_HOLE/DATA RPC */
#define OBD_CONNECT2_DOM_LVB 0x80000ULL /* pack DOM glimpse data in LVB */
#define OBD_CONNECT2_REP_MBITS 0x100000ULL /* match reply by mbits, not xid */
+#define OBD_CONNECT2_ATOMIC_OPEN_LOCK 0x4000000ULL/* request lock on 1st open */
/* XXX README XXX:
* Please DO NOT add flag values here before first ensuring that this same
* flag value is not in use on some other branch. Please clear any such
--
1.8.3.1
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list