[lustre-devel] [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] [DRAFT] Lustre client upstreaming
Day, Timothy
timday at amazon.com
Thu Feb 6 10:36:36 PST 2025
> To better cover the skew between different VMs running different subtests, we could change the test-framework code to run the subtests in different order (either starting at a random offset, or in random order).
>
> This would also expose some hidden assumptions and dependencies in the subtests themselves, so that would need to be fixed to avoid false test failures, but the main goal of the boilpot testing is finding crashes/deadlocks, so if a few tests fail because of minor test issues I don't think that is a blocker.
>
>
> Cheers, Andreas
We could also limit each VM to run a subset of the sanity tests. Then
we could cap the length of the longest run test. I have some scripting
magic already to divide up the subtests between VMs.
Tim Day
More information about the lustre-devel
mailing list