<div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div>Brian Reitz sent an email about GIT, that raises some questions, and I would like to initiate some discussion here how we can reach the best organization. <div><br></div><div>1. We need a public repository, where non Sun community members can commit.</div>
<div><br></div><div>a. There are Lustre users than have their own branches. LLNL has probably the best tested branch among all users. DDN's customers have a version of Lustre that includes patches not yet in Sun's releases. It would be very valuable if these kind of releases could be collected in a publicly accessible GIT repository.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I doubt that Sun will give commit rights to external entities (this is not unreasonable, Sun needs to control what code enters its repositories). Hence I think that the community would be better served with a GIT repository in a public place, like github, that can give such access. </div>
<div><br></div><div>My group at ClusterStor has reserved the "lustre" project at Github and we will give keys to any and all organizations that wish to make serious contributions to Lustre. I was in particular hoping that LLNL would be willing to commit their releases to that public place.</div>
<div><br></div><div>b. Everyone is uncertain about what Sun will do with Lustre (proprietary Solaris / ZFS server releases and discontinued support for Linux servers have been mentioned to me several times now). A public repository with the open code will be valuable for the commun<span style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">it</span><span style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">y </span><span style="font-family:arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;border-collapse:collapse"><span style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">and promote continued development and access</span><span style="border-collapse:separate;font-family:arial;font-size:small"><span style="background-color:rgb(255, 255, 255)">.</span></span></span></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>2. We need MUCH more in the repository than Sun is putting into it.</div><div><br></div><div>There are many development branches and sometimes abandoned projects that still have a lot of value. For example, there is a nearly complete OS X client port - what if someone wanted to pick that up? Similarly, there are projects like size on MDS or the network request scheduler that may need help from the community to get finished or re-prioritized.</div>
<div><br></div><div>It is unclear to me if these kind of branches can be found in the publicly available CVS. If they can, a collection of relevant branches, broadly along the lines of what I mention above, should be placed in the public GIT repository.</div>
<div><br></div><div>3. Brian's email message seems to indicate that Sun's git repository will be used for Sun development. In the past there were two CVS repositories - a read-only one that was publicly accessible and when I last controlled the group it was updated very frequently with all open source code (presently, it seems to only contain releases, not the development stream of commits). It is unclear how Sun can manage development with this git repository given that parts of its work are proprietary (like the Windows port) or unreleased (like the ZFS work). Can we get more insight in what Brian is alluding to?</div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I am sure other community members have further suggestions, and I hope we can discuss these here. If there is support for github as a good location, please let me know and we will give participants the keys. In particular I would like to publicly request that community members like LLNL that have quite possibly the highest quality releases, place them in github or publish another location where these can be found.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Thank you very much for your thoughts.</div><div><br></div><font color="#888888"><div>Peter</div>
</font></div><br>