<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 16/10/2019 17:23, Andreas Dilger
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:FA82114A-33F6-458D-8919-45AE8667EF0A@whamcloud.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
On Oct 16, 2019, at 19:21, <a href="mailto:quentin.bouget@cea.fr"
class="" moz-do-not-send="true">quentin.bouget@cea.fr</a> wrote:<br
class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class=""><br
class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<p class="">Hello,</p>
<p class="">It seems like Maloo is not scheduling tests
for <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://review.whamcloud.com/#/c/36292/"
class="">
this patch</a> since I added some test parameters
yesterday:</p>
<blockquote class="">
<pre class="">Test-Parameters: fortestonly testlist=sanity clientarch=ppc64
</pre>
</blockquote>
<p class="">Are there problems on Maloo, or am I doing
something wrong?</p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div>
</div>
The "fortestonly" keyword is for patches that are not intended
for landing (e.g. work-in-progress patches for early review), so
only a limited number of tests are run.</div>
<br>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, I understand this. The idea was to check that the current
version of the patch does fail on a big-endian client. But it does
not seem like any tests are being scheduled.</p>
<p>EDIT: I just checked gerrit, there must have been a temporary
failure, a retest was requested by M. Omstead.<br>
</p>
<p>Thanks,<br>
Quentin<br>
</p>
</body>
</html>