[Lustre-discuss] Problems & partial success on PPC64 (XServe G5) Debian cluster
Robert Olson
olson at mcs.anl.gov
Wed Nov 21 14:37:30 PST 2007
On Nov 21, 2007, at 4:30 PM, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2007 13:25 -0600, Robert Olson wrote:
>> OK, early indications are good here. Started out with MDT on PPC
>> with OST
>> on intel, ran iozone up to 1M files and it finished without error
>> and with
>> reasonable performance.
>
> Can you please run "e2fsck -fn" (from a Lustre-patched e2fsprogs)
> on the
> filesystems after your tests.
What will that tell me?
>
> The extents,mballoc options are primarily aimed at improving the
> performance
> under high load by reducing CPU usage and getting better
> allocation. if
> you have mostly small files then the performance difference won't
> be huge.
is this one of the changes that improves write performance? I've
notice write performance lagging reads.
I've got the system running with a 7 OSTs, and getting near-wire-rate
reads from wide stripes to a single node with large files according
to iozone.
--bob
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list