[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.4.3 changes CPU mapping in RHEL., and 10x performance loss in one application
Aaron Knister
aaron at iges.org
Tue Apr 22 21:25:35 PDT 2008
Did you ever find a resolution? And out of curiosity, how did you
determine that the core to logical processor allocation had changed?
I'm trying to figure it out in my own set up.
-Aaron
On Apr 10, 2008, at 2:13 PM, Chris Worley wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 12:05 PM, Johann Lombardi <johann at sun.com>
> wrote:
>> Chris,
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 06:11:32PM -0600, Chris Worley wrote:
>>> I was running RHEL's 2.6.9-67.0.4 kernel w/o Lustre patches, and the
>>
>> What is the CPU architecture? x86_64 or IA64?
>
> x86_64.
>
>>
>>
>>> core to logical processor allocation was (as shown by /proc/
>>> cpuinfo):
>>>
>>>
>>> ============= ============= Socket
>>>
>>> ====== ====== ====== ====== L2 cache domain
>>>
>>> 0 4 1 5 2 6 3 7
>>> logical processor
>>>
>>>
>>> After installing the Lustre version of the kernel, the allocation
>>> is:
>>>
>>> ============= ============= Socket
>>>
>>> ====== ====== ====== ====== L2 cache domain
>>>
>>> 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
>>> logical processor
>>
>> Hard to believe that one of our patches could cause this.
>> Have you compared the kernel config files?
>
> This is the default from RedHat vs. the default from
> downloads.lustre.org. We didn't rebuild either from scratch.
>
> Chris
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Johann
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
Aaron Knister
Associate Systems Analyst
Center for Ocean-Land-Atmosphere Studies
(301) 595-7000
aaron at iges.org
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list