[Lustre-discuss] raid5 patches for rhel5
Robin Humble
rjh+lustre at cita.utoronto.ca
Fri Aug 1 06:38:58 PDT 2008
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:08:41PM -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>On Jul 18, 2008 08:39 -0400, Robin Humble wrote:
>> I notice that Lustre 1.6.5 brings with it the md layer RAID5 patches
>> for RHEL5 kernels. thanks! :-)
>> are all the RHEL4 optimisations there, so we should get the same
>> performance if we now move our OSS's to RHEL5?
>That is my understanding, yes.
done, and yes, performance is largely the same as RHEL4. cool!
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size:chnk K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
rhel4 oss 16G:256k 84624 99 842138 92 310044 91 77675 99 491239 96 285.8 10
rhel5 oss 16G:256k 86085 99 827731 95 327007 97 79639 100 495487 98 456.2 18
streaming writes are down marginally on rhel5, but seeks/s are up 50%.
BTW - the above is with 1.6.4.3 clients.
1.6.5.1 client still perform badly for us. eg.
Version 1.03 ------Sequential Output------ --Sequential Input- --Random-
-Per Chr- --Block-- -Rewrite- -Per Chr- --Block-- --Seeks--
Machine Size:chnk K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP K/sec %CP /sec %CP
16G:256k 77216 99 462659 100 296050 96 68100 81 648350 93 422.2 13
which shows better streaming writes, but ~1/2 the streaming read speed :-(
> Note that there are also similar
>performance improvements for RAID-6.
I can't see the RAID6 patches in the tree for RHEL5... am I missing
something?
cheers,
robin
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list