[Lustre-discuss] Lustre IOkit newbie: sgpdd-survey
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Fri Aug 1 06:48:18 PDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 14:12 -0400, Ms. Megan Larko wrote:
>
> megan: I am attaching the file from
> /tmp/sgpdd_survey_2008-07-29 at 15:40_oss4.crew.local.detail
> The complaint seems to be that the memory cannot be accessed.
Allocated, not accessed:
==============> total_size 17487872K rsz 1024 crg 1 thr 4
=====> write
sg starting out command at "sgp_dd.c":843: Cannot allocate memory
=====> read
sg starting in command at "sgp_dd.c":784: Cannot allocate memory
==============> total_size 17487872K rsz 1024 crg 1 thr 8
=====> write
sg starting out command at "sgp_dd.c":843: Cannot allocate memory
=====> read
sg starting in command at "sgp_dd.c":784: Cannot allocate memory
==============> total_size 17487872K rsz 1024 crg 1 thr 16
=====> write
sg starting out command at "sgp_dd.c":843: Cannot allocate memory
=====> read
sg starting in command at "sgp_dd.c":784: Cannot allocate memory
==============> total_size 17487872K rsz 1024 crg 2 thr 4
=====> write
sg starting out command at "sgp_dd.c":843: Cannot allocate memory
sg starting out command at "sgp_dd.c":843: Cannot allocate memory
=====> read
sg starting in command at "sgp_dd.c":784: Cannot allocate memory
sg starting in command at "sgp_dd.c":784: Cannot allocate memory
So for whatever reason sgp_dd can't allocate memory.
> megan: Pasting result--
> [root at oss4 ~]# sgp_dd of=/dev/sg16 if=/dev/null count=10 bs=512 time=1
> time to transfer data was 0.000121 secs
> remaining block count=10
> 0+0 records in
> 0+0 records out
Hrm. The result doesn't look right.
> Note that a "cat /proc/meminfo" shows 16Gb RAM on the machine oss4.
> [root at oss4 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal: 16439328 kB
> MemFree: 16101332 kB
> Buffers: 32260 kB
> Cached: 205820 kB
I don't really know why you'd be getting those errors then. Buggy
version of sgp_dd maybe? Buggy something else?
> BTW I am running iozone v. 3.283 on the OS drive, a RAID6 JBOD disk
> formatted ext3 and one of our existing Lustre disks and the lustre
> system is doing well under iozone.
Good.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080801/87f58d6a/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list