[Lustre-discuss] Nodes claim error with files, then say everything is fine.

Brian J. Murrell Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Wed Aug 6 07:19:07 PDT 2008


On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 07:26 -0600, Chris Worley wrote:
> This seems to be caused by a specific file or directory.  The files in
> this directory cycle through having errors trying to see the file,
> then, moments later, it sees the file with the wrong size, then it
> sees it fine.  For example (<dir> and <user> replace the actual
> username and directory), these three "ls" commands were done in quick
> succession, at first et[06-10,11,13,15] claim an I/O error trying to
> "ls" the file, then et[07,09,13] see the file at 0 length, then they
> see it correctly (with et11 still showing an I/O error... which still
> doesn't seem to be going away):

Are there any Lustre messages in your syslog on the clients which are
returning unexpected results?

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080806/170f06e0/attachment.pgp>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list