[Lustre-discuss] Nodes claim error with files, then say everything is fine.

Chris Worley worleys at gmail.com
Thu Aug 14 23:00:41 PDT 2008


On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote:
> dOn Wed, 2008-08-06 at 12:11 -0600, Chris Worley wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +rpctrace debug is probably the way to go to see what the client
>> > are(n't) doing in terms of keeping the MDS aware of it's existence.
>> >
>>
>> The log from the client perspective starts with a lot of packet mismatches:
>>
>> 00000100:00020000:3:1217629906.902955:0:5592:0:(events.c:116:reply_in_callback())
>> early reply sized 176, expect 128
>> 00000100:00020000:3:1217633409.730495:0:5590:0:(events.c:116:reply_in_callback())
>> early reply sized 240, expect 128
>
> Given the amount of debug provided, this looks like it could be bug
> 16534 which is on my plate to test the solution for and land.
>

In adding info to bugzilla, you clarified that this is actually bug #16237.

This bug is "fixed" and in Lustre 1.6.6... but 1.6.6 isn't released.

Is there a work-around for the 1.6.5.1 client (short of rebooting)?

Thanks,

Chris



More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list