[Lustre-discuss] Bug when using /dev/cciss/c0d2 as mdt/ost

Mag Gam magawake at gmail.com
Mon Dec 29 08:18:01 PST 2008


Interesting. Just for the record, we have a P800 controller on DL380,
and we get no such problems. Running on 1.6.5

Has this problem been addressed? Because we are planning to go to
1.6.6, but I don't want to face problems like this :-)

TIA



On Thu, Dec 25, 2008 at 1:09 AM, rishi pathak <mailmaverick666 at gmail.com> wrote:
> In this setup there are 15 OSS each having 840GB targets and one MDS with
> 840GB mdt. All nodes are HP DL580G5 servers. These servers come with HP
> Smart Array P400.Raid volumes are visible as /dev/cciss/[c0d0,c0d1].
> Creation of back end fs used to fail giving errors
>
> mkfs.lustre FATAL: failed to write local files
> mkfs.lustre: exiting with 12 (Cannot allocate memory)
>
> . A search on lustre-dicuss showed that this was a bug in ldisk module. See
> the below link for more clarification:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org/msg01713.html
>
> The solution was to fix the code and rebuild it against the pre-patched
> lustre-kernel source. I hope I have made myself clear :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Brian J. Murrell <Brian.Murrell at sun.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2008-12-24 at 11:02 +0530, rishi pathak wrote:
>> > I am trying to build lustre-1.6.6 against the pre-patched kernel
>> > downloaded from SUN.
>>
>> Can I ask, just out of curiosity, why you are trying to build and don't
>> just use the provided RPMs?
>>
>> > But as written in Operations manual, it creates rpms for
>> > 2.6.18-92.1.10.el5_lustrecustom. Is there a way to ask it not to
>> > append custom as extraversion.
>>
>> If I understand your problem correctly, you can edit the Makefile in the
>> kernel source and remove the "custom" from the EXTRAVERSION.
>
> I tried that but it seems like it is hard coded in each and every
> autoMakefile & Makefile.
> I accepted defeat because of deadline and rebuild kernel and lustre again.
> Setup is over IB and is working fine (yet to benchmark it though).
>>
>>
>> b.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>
>
> --
> Regards--
> Rishi Pathak
> National PARAM Supercomputing Facility
> Center for Development of Advanced Computing(C-DAC)
> Pune University Campus,Ganesh Khind Road
> Pune-Maharastra
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
>



More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list