[Lustre-discuss] Am I missing something?

[Timh Bergström]

Hi again,

Discard my e-mail - I compiled to early in the morning and included the
--enable-mindf option in configure. After re-reading the configure options
and great help from adilger and scjody in #lustre I finally figured out that
I was overseeing the whole stripe thing.

Best Regards,
Timh

2008/2/12, Timh Bergström <timh.bergstrom at diino.net>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just got a smaller Lustre system running with 1 mdt/mgs and 2 ost's. On
> the osts i've added 1x10GB disk and 1x20GB disk
>  on each system and formatted and mounted them as /mnt/ost1-4 (ost1) and
> /mnt/ost2-3 (ost2). I've also mounted the lustre system on the mdt/mgs
> server with mount -t lustre x.y.n.p at tcp:/testfs /mnt/lustre. So far so
> good, however df -h only reports 9/60GB avail where lsf df -h reports
> 54.4G available.
>
> 172.16.x.y at tcp:/testfs
>                        60G   50G  9.0G  85% /mnt/lustre
>
> vs
>
> filesystem summary:      59.1G      4.7G     54.4G    7% /mnt/lustre
>
> --
>
> lustre-client:/mnt/lustre# du -hcs
> 4.0K    .
> 4.0K    total
>
> I cant find anything on this in the lists or manual, but do  you have to
> have equal size disks to get all the usable space available to the system
> mounting lustre? Is this somehow connected to stripe-size or some automatic
> failover settings. My original intent was to create a large storage area
> using lustre for numerous clients to mount and use as diskspace.
>
> --
> Timh Bergström
> System Administrator
> Diino AB - www.diino.com
> :wq




-- 
Timh Bergström
System Administrator
Diino AB - www.diino.com
:wq
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080212/e9dcf3ac/attachment.htm>