[Lustre-discuss] Lustre Bug 13197
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Wed Feb 20 06:27:40 PST 2008
On Sun, 2008-02-17 at 08:04 -0500, Charles Taylor wrote:
> We are running lustre 1.6.3 with some patches we applied by hand with
> a patched 2.6.18-8.1.14 kernel on both the clients and servers.
> We think we are now hitting lustre bug 13197
Do you mean 13917?
> and can no longer
> operate without a fix. We could apply the 13197 patch to 1.6.3 and
> keep going as we are but we would like to start moving to 1.6.4.2.
Good idea.
> Would it be insane to update to 1.6.4.2 on the MDS and OSSs while
> continuing to run 1.6.3 on the clients
If you want to fix 13917, yes. 13917 is a client-side fix.
> or is 1.6.4.2 similar enough
> to interoperate with 1.6.3 clients?
Our interoperability commitment provides that 1.6.3 and 1.6.4.2 will
inter-operate, however upgrading the OSS and MDS only will not fix
13917.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080220/c970b2e8/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list