[Lustre-discuss] Starting a Lustre File System

[Amit Sharma]

Please refer the following in the lustre manual, for simple configurations :
http://manual.lustre.org/manual/LustreManual16_HTML/DynamicHTML-05-1.html#wp1065092


regards,
Amit



ashok bharat bayana wrote:
> 
> Hi
> I build successfully lustre and configured patchless client on kernel 
> (2.6.20.15) and of lustre(1.6.4.2).
> I configured using ./configure --with-linux=/unpatched/kernel/source
> 
> and then I build using make and installed the modules using make install.
> 
> Now in order to run the llmount.sh script,we require lmc,lconf utilities 
> but these are not there in lustre 1.6 so how to proceed with starting a 
> file system.(using MGS)
> 
> Regards,
> Ashok Bharat
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: lustre-discuss-bounces at lists.lustre.org on behalf of 
> lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org
> Sent: Mon 2/25/2008 10:30 PM
> To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> Subject: Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 25, Issue 53
> 
> Send Lustre-discuss mailing list submissions to
>         lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         lustre-discuss-request at lists.lustre.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         lustre-discuss-owner at lists.lustre.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Lustre-discuss digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: 2.6.23 client systems with any        compatible      server 
> (Jim Garlick)
>    2. Re: Help needed in building patchless client      for     lustre
>       (Brian J. Murrell)
>    3. Re: Help needed in building patchless client      for     lustre
>       (Brian J. Murrell)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:24:49 -0800
> From: Jim Garlick <garlick at llnl.gov>
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] 2.6.23 client systems with any
>         compatible      server
> To: Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com>
> Cc: lustre-discuss at clusterfs.com
> Message-ID: <20080225162448.GA10682 at llnl.gov>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> 
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 09:19:27PM -0700, Andreas Dilger wrote:
>  >
>  > Could you also elaborate on the "1.6.4.* compatibility issue"?  There
>  > shouldn't be any compatibility problems between 1.6 releases, though
>  > the current b1_6 development branch has a feature (adaptive timeouts)
>  > which is likely to be removed before the final release.  I would suggest
>  > getting the specific Lustre release you want by CVS tag (v1_6_4_3 
> probably)
>  > instead of the CVS tip.
> 
> Andreas, are you saying adaptive timeouts are likely to be deferred to 1.8?
> 
> Jim
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:32:21 -0500
> From: "Brian J. Murrell" <Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM>
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Help needed in building patchless client
>         for     lustre
> To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> Message-ID: <1203957141.8507.20.camel at pc.ilinx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> 
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 13:10 +0530, ashok bharat bayana wrote:
>  > hi!
>  > I tried to build lustre-1.6.4.2 in my system, but the following error 
> occured,
>  >
>  > 
> /home/bharat/Desktop/lustre-1.6/lustre-1.6.4.2/lustre/lvfs/lvfs_linux.c:345: 
> error: too few arguments to function ?vfs_rename?
> 
> This smacks of a Ubuntu kernel.  Ubuntu Gutsy to be precise.  If so, you
> will be out of luck.  Ubuntu have added AppArmor to their kernel and
> that addition has resulted in a number of VFS API changes which we do
> not handle.
> 
>  > my kernel version is 2.6.22.14.
> 
> Yeah, that looks like a Ubuntu kernel.
> 
> b.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : 
> http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080225/c125dc2c/attachment-0001.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2008 11:33:30 -0500
> From: "Brian J. Murrell" <Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM>
> Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Help needed in building patchless client
>         for     lustre
> To: lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> Message-ID: <1203957211.8507.22.camel at pc.ilinx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> 
> On Mon, 2008-02-25 at 02:54 -0500, Tom.Wang wrote:
>  > add --disable-server when you configure patchless client.
> 
> Just for the record on this thread, configure should detect an unpatched
> kernel source and assume "--disable-server" automagically.
> 
> b.
> 
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: not available
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 189 bytes
> Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
> Url : 
> http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss/attachments/20080225/cacb285a/attachment-0001.bin
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> 
> 
> End of Lustre-discuss Digest, Vol 25, Issue 53
> **********************************************
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss


-- 
Amit Sharma
Lustre Engineering
Sun Microsystems, Bangalore.