[Lustre-discuss] x64_64 vs. x86
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Tue Jul 29 07:34:22 PDT 2008
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 16:15 +0200, Papp Tamás wrote:
>
> Sure, 2 server. It's OK, at the same time it's mountet on one server.
> The point is on the drbd and
> lustre meta data and 32 vs. 64 bit. Is there anything not compatible on
> the 2 environments around this?
Ahhh. To re-iterate, you just want to know if there are any known
incompatibilities in running an i686 and x86_64 failover pair?
If so, there shouldn't be any issues given that we support both i686 and
x86_64 servers and on-disk format inherits nothing from the architecture
of the CPU which is writing it.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080729/d9c16d25/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list