[Lustre-discuss] performance issues in simple lustre setup
Isaac Huang
He.Huang at Sun.COM
Tue Jun 3 07:15:36 PDT 2008
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 08:32:09AM -0400, Murray Smigel wrote:
> Some additional information on the problem. I tried disconnecting the
> ethernet connection to
> the server machine (192.168.1.94) and tried running a disk test on the
> client (192.168.1.156 via ethernet), writing to
> what I thought was the IB mounted file system (mount -t lustre
> 192.168.3.50 at o2ib:/lusty /slut, where 192.168.3.50 is
> the ip of ib0 on the client machine).
> Looking at /var/log/syslog I saw:
> Jun 3 08:18:59 nasnu3 kernel: Lustre:
> 3625:0:(router.c:167:lnet_notify()) Ignoring prediction from
> 192.168.1.156 at tcp of 192.168.1.94 at tcp down 23987983711 seconds in the
> future
Known bug, and already fixed:
https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14300
> ......
> lusty-MDT0000-mdc-ffff810226207000: Connection restored to service
> lusty-MDT0000 using nid 192.168.1.94 at tcp.
It seemed to me that Lustre was actually using the @tcp network, which
could be a Lustre configuration issue.
Isaac
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list