[Lustre-discuss] lfsck
Charles Taylor
taylor at hpc.ufl.edu
Wed Jun 4 11:37:26 PDT 2008
Here is a question (or perhaps a veiled comment/complaint). Why
does lfsck list *every* file name to stderr? Doesn't that just make
a painfully slow process even slower? Would it be better to just
report progress periodically and any *important* errors that need to
be addressed.
So far on a 33TB file system (8 OSSs, 24 OSTs), the time required has
been....
Generate mdsdb: 6.5 hours (94GB, sparse)
Generate ostdbs: 45 mins each (400 to 600 MB each)
Copying db's around : 45 min to an hour
Actual LFSCK: ????? (an hour so far but we have 30,600,000 files
(roughly) so I fear this will get ugly.
I'm not making any real point here - just sharing information and,
well, killing time... :)
Charlie Taylor
UF HPC Center
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list