[Lustre-discuss] Performance parameters
Enrico Morelli
morelli at cerm.unifi.it
Fri Jun 6 08:47:10 PDT 2008
On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:24:28 -0400
"Brian J. Murrell" <Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-06-06 at 17:06 +0200, Enrico Morelli wrote:
> >
> > On lustre:
> > time dd if=/dev/zero of=test.txt bs=1M count=1024
> > 1024+0 records in
> > 1024+0 records out
> >
> > real 0m21.260s
>
> So, about 48MiB/s, yes? What does your storage backend look like?
The server is connected to an MSA60 with 7x500GB SATA HDD in RAID 6.
>
> > user 0m0.000s
> > sys 0m1.600s
> >
> > On NFS:
> > time dd if=/dev/zero of=test.txt bs=1M count=1024
> > 1024+0 records in
> > 1024+0 records out
> >
> > real 0m2.561s
>
> 399MiB/s. Do you believe this? Does it correlate with the storage
> backend on the NFS server and the network interconnect between your
> NFS client and NFS server?
Sorry, sorry, sorry, I'm very tired. I connected directly to the NFS
server :-(((( On a client machine the time is more than 1 minutes.
The problem is that a lot of people told me that 'ls' required a lot of
time, a 'cp' required a lot of time, all operations on lustre
filesystem are very slow. The people that works on lustre has a lot of
files to manage, so testing his directories I found that an 'ls' require
a lot of time and the same for 'cp' and 'rm' operations.
The dd was not a better test to do. Sorry again.
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
(o_
(o_ //\ Coltivate Linux che tanto Windows si pianta da solo.
(/)_ V_/_
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
| ENRICO MORELLI | email: morelli at CERM.UNIFI.IT |
| * * * * | phone: +39 055 4574269 |
| University of Florence | fax : +39 055 4574253 |
| CERM - via Sacconi, 6 - 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (FI) - ITALY |
+------------------------------------------------------------------+
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list