[Lustre-discuss] OSS load in the roof

Brock Palen brockp at umich.edu
Fri Jun 27 11:29:24 PDT 2008


On Jun 27, 2008, at 2:22 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:44:13PM -0400, Brock Palen wrote:
>> On Jun 27, 2008, at 1:39 PM, Bernd Schubert wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 01:07:32PM -0400, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 12:44 -0400, Brock Palen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> All of them are stuck in un-interruptible sleep.
>>>>> Has anyone seen this happen before?  Is this caused by a pending
>>>>> disk
>>>>> failure?
>>>>
>>>> Well, they are certainly stuck because of some blocking I/O.  That
>>>> could
>>>> be disk failure, indeed.
>>>>
>>>>> mptscsi: ioc1: attempting task abort! (sc=0000010038904c40)
>>>>> scsi1 : destination target 0, lun 0
>>>>>          command = Read (10) 00 75 94 40 00 00 10 00 00
>>>>> mptscsi: ioc1: task abort: SUCCESS (sc=0000010038904c40)
>>>>
>>>> That does not look like a picture of happiness, indeed, no.  You  
>>>> have
>>>> SCSI commands aborting.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, these messages are not nice of course, since the mpt error
>>> handler
>>> got activated, but in principle a scsi device can recover then.
>>> Unfortunately, the verbosity level of scsi makes it impossbible to
>>> figure out what was actually the problem. Since we suffered from
>>> severe
>>> scsi problems, I wrote quite a number of patches to improve the
>>> situation.
>>> We now at least can understand where the problem came from and also
>>> have
>>> a slightly improved error handling. These are presently for 2.6.22
>>> only,
>>> but my plan is to sent these upstream for 2.6.28.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Lustre: 6698:0:(lustre_fsfilt.h:306:fsfilt_setattr()) nobackup-
>>>>> OST0001: slow setattr 100s
>>>>> Lustre: 6698:0:(watchdog.c:312:lcw_update_time()) Expired watchdog
>>>>> for pid 6698 disabled after 103.1261s
>>>>
>>>> Those are just fallout from the above disk situation.
>>>
>>> Probably the device was offlined and actually this also should have
>>> been
>>> printed in the logs. Brock, can you check the device status
>>> (cat /sys/block/sdX/device/state).
>>
>> IO Is still flowing from both OST's on that OSS,
>>
>> [root at nyx167 ~]# cat /sys/block/sd*/device/state
>> running
>> running
>
> So the device recovered. Is the parallel-scsi? If so it now might  
> run at
> a lower scsi speed level, but you should have got domain validation  
> messages
> about this (unless you are using a customized driver, which has DV  
> disabled).

Its Fibre Channel for the medium. Direct connected (no loop or  
switch)  So I am not sure,  the driver is the stock one with RHEL4.

>
>
> Cheers,
> Bernd
>
>




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list