[Lustre-discuss] lustre and small files overhead

[Joe Barjo]

Andreas Dilger a écrit :
> Joe Barjo <mailto:jobarjo78 at yahoo.fr> wrote:
>   
>> Turning off debuging made it much better.
>> It went from 1m54 down to 25 seconds, but still 85% of system processing...
>> I really think you should turn off debuging by default, or make it appear
>> as a BIG warning message.
>>
>> People who are trying lustre for the first time are not going to debug lustre.
>> Also, looking in the documentation, though the debugging was documented, it
>> was not clear that removing it would improve performance so much.
>>
>> I will now make more tests and see how the coherency is...
>> Thanks for your support.
>>     
>
> What version of Lustre are you using?  We have turned down the default
> debugging level in more recent versions of Lustre.
>
>   
I'm using the latest stable 1.6.4.2 centos4 rpms
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080304/ee332157/attachment.htm>