[Lustre-discuss] ko2iblnd panics in kiblnd_map_tx_descs
Chris Worley
worleys at gmail.com
Wed Mar 5 06:31:28 PST 2008
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:30 AM, Chris Worley <worleys at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 7:24 AM, Sébastien Buisson
> <sebastien.buisson at bull.net> wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I have the same problem described by Chris, so I am interested in the
> > solution. ;-)
> > The problem is that I do not understand where to copy the OFED
> > Module.symvers.
>
> It goes in your kernel source directory...i.e.: /usr/src/linux/.
And don't copy it, append it... and make sure no IB symbols are in
there already.
Chris
>
> Chris
>
>
> > I tried to put it in the directory where I build lustre
> > (subdirectories are build, ldiskfs, libsysio, lnet, lustre and snmp),
> > but I still get the "undefined symbols" messages when building.
> >
> > Any idea?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Sebastien.
> >
> >
> > Liang Zhen a écrit :
> >
> >
> > > Hi Chris,
> > > To resolve your problem, please:
> > > 1. apply this patch to your lnet:
> > > https://bugzilla.lustre.org/attachment.cgi?id=15733
> > > 2. please make sure use this option while configure:
> > > --with-o2ib=/path/to/ofed
> > > 3. Copy /path/to/ofed/Module.symvers to your $LUSTRE before building
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Liang
> > >
> > > Chris Worley wrote:
> > >> I'm trying to port Lustre 1.6.4.2 to OFED 1.2.5.5 w/ the RHEL kernel
> > >> 2.6.9.67.0.4.
> > >>
> > >> ksocklnd-based mounts work fine, but when I try to mount over IB, I
> > >> get a panic in ko2iblnd in the transmit descriptor mapping routine:
> > >>
> > >> general protection fault: 0000 [1] SMP
> > >> CPU 1
> > >> Modules linked in: ko2iblnd(U) ptlrpc(U) obdclass(U) lnet(U) lvfs(U)
> > >> libcfs(U) nfs(U) lockd(U) nfs_acl(U) sunrpc(U) rdma_ucm(U) ib_sdp(U)
> > >> rdma_cm(U) iw_cm(U) ib_addr(U) mlx4_ib(U) mlx4_core(U) ib_mthca(U)
> > >> dm_mod(U) ib_ipoib(U) md5(U) ipv6(U) ib_umad(U) ib_ucm(U) ib_uverbs(U)
> > >> ib_cm(U) ib_sa(U) ib_mad(U) ib_core(U) aic79xx(U) e1000(U) ext3(U)
> > >> jbd(U) raid0(U) mptscsih(U) mptsas(U) mptspi(U) mptscsi(U) mptbase(U)
> > >> sd_mod(U) ata_piix(U) libata(U) scsi_mod(U)
> > >> Pid: 5141, comm: modprobe Not tainted 2.6.9-67.0.4.EL-Lustre-1.6.4.2
> > >> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa04659d1>]
> > >> <ffffffffa04659d1>{:ko2iblnd:kiblnd_map_tx_descs+225}
> > >> RSP: 0000:00000102105d7cd8 EFLAGS: 00010286
> > >> RAX: ffffffffa01e6b4e RBX: ffffff0010028000 RCX: 0000000000000001
> > >> RDX: 0000000000001000 RSI: 000001020e705000 RDI: 00000102154e2000
> > >> RBP: 00000102102c4200 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > >> R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 00000000ffffffff R12: 0000000000000000
> > >> R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 00000102102c4228
> > >> FS: 0000002a958a0b00(0000) GS:ffffffff8046ac00(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > >> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
> > >> CR2: 0000002a9598200f CR3: 000000009fa08000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
> > >> Process modprobe (pid: 5141, threadinfo 00000102105d6000, task 00000102175e0030)
> > >> Stack: 0000000000000000 00000102102c4080 00000102102c4100 00000102102c4200
> > >> 00000102179c2b86 00000102177df400 0000010215548ac0 ffffffffa0466fdf
> > >> 00000102179c2b85 0000000000000000
> > >> Call Trace:<ffffffffa0466fdf>{:ko2iblnd:kiblnd_startup+2239}
> > >> <ffffffffa03043dc>{:lnet:lnet_startup_lndnis+332}
> > >> <ffffffffa02d2f38>{:libcfs:cfs_alloc+40}
> > >> <ffffffffa0305206>{:lnet:LNetNIInit+278}
> > >> <ffffffffa03fcb0a>{:ptlrpc:ptlrpc_ni_init+106}
> > >> <ffffffff8012f9cd>{default_wake_function+0}
> > >> <ffffffffa03fcbfa>{:ptlrpc:ptlrpc_init_portals+10}
> > >> <ffffffff8012f9cd>{default_wake_function+0}
> > >> <ffffffffa045f22b>{:ptlrpc:init_module+267}
> > >> <ffffffff8014bc0a>{sys_init_module+278}
> > >> <ffffffff8010f23e>{system_call+126}
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Code: ff 50 08 eb 12 48 8b 3f b9 01 00 00 00 ba 00 10 00 00 e8 30
> > >> RIP <ffffffffa04659d1>{:ko2iblnd:kiblnd_map_tx_descs+225} RSP <00000102105d7cd8>
> > >>
> > >> Does this ring any bells? Otherwise, any debugging tips?
> > >>
> > >> Shane said that they get an oops if they compile with the "version
> > >> specific OFA tree". Is this the Oops?
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> Chris
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> > >> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> > >> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> > >>
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Lustre-discuss mailing list
> > > Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> > > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list