[Lustre-discuss] can't umount an OST

[jrs]

Here's the attached log.

Thanks

John

D. Marc Stearman wrote:
> On May 4, 2008, at 2:37 AM, Alex Lyashkov wrote:
> 
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: LustreError: 18105:0:(client.c: 
>>> 504:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) @@@ Uninitialized import.   
>>> req at ffff8101e6c7c200
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: LustreError: 18105:0:(client.c: 
>>> 506:ptlrpc_import_delay_req()) LBUG
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: Lustre: 18105:0:(linux-debug.c: 
>>> 168:libcfs_debug_dumpstack()) showing stack for process 18105
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: lfs           R  running  
>>> task       0 18105  12088                     (NOTLB)
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: 0000000000000000 ffffffff8840741c  
>>> 0000000000000004 ffff8101d7642ac0
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        ffff8101efe779a0  
>>> ffffffff8016079c ffff8101e6c7c200 ffff8101e6c7c200
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        ffff8101d3a609b8  
>>> ffffffff883fb72b
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: Call Trace: <ffffffff8840741c> 
>>> {:ptlrpc:lustre_pack_request+1052}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        <ffffffff8016079c> 
>>> {filemap_nopage+387} <ffffffff883fb72b>{:ptlrpc:ptlrpc_queue_wait 
>>> +571}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        <ffffffff883f92c4> 
>>> {:ptlrpc:ptlrpc_prep_req_pool+1796}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        <ffffffff88426d4c> 
>>> {:ptlrpc:lprocfs_wr_ping+428} <ffffffff802d968d>{__down_read+18}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        <ffffffff8836f29b> 
>>> {:obdclass:lprocfs_fops_write+91}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        <ffffffff80181803>{vfs_write 
>>> +215} <ffffffff80181dca>{sys_write+69}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel:        <ffffffff8010ad3e> 
>>> {system_call+126}
>>> May  2 12:53:59 samba02 kernel: LustreError: dumping log to /tmp/ 
>>> lustre-log.1209754439.18105
>>>
>> can you please open new bug report and
>> submit /tmp/lustre-log.1209754439.18105 to bug?
> 
> This looks like https://bugzilla.lustre.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15505  
> comment 5 number 2.  As Alex says, the lustre logs will be essential  
> in fixing this.
> 
> -Marc
> 
> ----
> D. Marc Stearman
> LC Lustre Administration Lead
> marc at llnl.gov
> 925.423.9670
> Pager: 1.888.203.0641
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: lustre-log.1209754439.18105.bz2
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 110792 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20080505/bfeacf64/attachment.obj>