[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5.1 patches

[JD Neumann]

!.6.6 is released and should be available from the down load center.
J.D.

Wojciech Turek wrote:
> I have some spare hardware (20TB of storage and several PE2950 
> servers) and I would like to use it as a test platform for new lustre 
> version. I noticed that some people talk  about testing beta version 
> of 1.6.6. Can some one tell me where could I obtain rc version of 1.6.6 ?
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Mag Gam wrote:
>> Thankyou very much. I have done this for 48 hours now and no problem
>> to report. The new rc version is remarkable and the statahead problems
>> aren't occuring anymore!
>>
>> Thanks again
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:12 AM, Andreas Dilger <adilger at sun.com> wrote:
>>   
>>> On Oct 11, 2008  12:15 -0400, Mag Gam wrote:
>>>     
>>>> I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running 1.6.5.1
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>       
>>>>> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the
>>>>> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data
>>>>> corruption?
>>>>>         
>>> No, we always test 1.x.y against 1.x.y-1 and 1.x-1.latest during our
>>> QA process.  In general there should never be any chance of data corruption
>>> no matter what two releases you try to use together, because if there
>>> is (and we know about it, of course) then those versions would explicitly
>>> be detected as non-interoperable at connect time.
>>>
>>> Cheers, Andreas
>>> --
>>> Andreas Dilger
>>> Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
>>> Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
>>>
>>>
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>   
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>