[Lustre-discuss] Is patchless ok for EL4 now?

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 17:16 +0100, Peter Kjellstrom wrote: 
> 
> Maybe this could be cleared up on the wiki? The wiki says >=-55 is ok. You 
> said in July:
> 
> >> Does anyone know if  patchless clients are available in lustre
> >> 1.6.5.x.  We want to use 2.6.9-67-redhat.  Thanks for your help.
> >
> > No.  The 2.6.9 kernel is too old to support the patchless client.  You
> > need to upgrade to either RHEL5 or SLES10 on the clients for patchless
> > clients.

This was likely me just not knowing at the time that RedHat had actually
fixed the problems in their 2.6.9 kernel that was making use of the
patchless client unreliable.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20081106/f337c551/attachment.pgp>