[Lustre-discuss] Hardware or software RAID?
Mark Dixon
m.c.dixon at leeds.ac.uk
Thu Nov 20 04:26:03 PST 2008
Hi,
Which method of RAID is preferred with Lustre: hardware or software?
This might seem like a daft question, but I'm a newbie. The list,
operations guide and various "best practice" papers do not appear to
express a preference.
I'm thinking about a system with:
* 2x failover MDS with a RAID1 or RAID10 volume
* 2x failover OSS with RAID5 or RAID6 volumes.
I'm trying to gauge whether it's worth having shared storage arrays for
each failover set with hardware RAID, or just leave them as dual-attached
JBODs.
My instinct says that hardware RAID from a reputable vendor is best -
particularly because there's a battery-backed cache - but I see from the
lists that Lustre has put a lot of effort in improving the Linux MD RAID
layer.
Thanks,
Mark
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Dixon Email : m.c.dixon at leeds.ac.uk
HPC/Grid Systems Support Tel (int): 35429
Information Systems Services Tel (ext): +44(0)113 343 5429
University of Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
-----------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list