[Lustre-discuss] 1.6.5.1 patches

Mag Gam magawake at gmail.com
Sat Oct 11 09:15:42 PDT 2008


I meant to say, 5 clients running 1.6.6 and the remainder running 1.6.5.1


On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:14 AM, Mag Gam <magawake at gmail.com> wrote:
> Would there be a problem if we have 5 servers running 1.6.6 and the
> remainder of them running 1.6.5.1? Is there a chance of data
> corruption?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Brian J. Murrell
> <Brian.Murrell at sun.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, 2008-10-11 at 07:41 +0700, sd a wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> When is release date for 1.6.6?
>>
>> I think I already answered today that I don't know when 1.6.6 will be
>> released because for the most part, nobody does.
>>
>> We don't make release date promises or predictions because we don't even
>> know the date until the QA cycle for a release candidate is complete in
>> which case the release date is for all intents and purposes that day --
>> the overhead for getting packages from QA to the SDLC, etc. aside.
>>
>> Each and every release candidate that goes to QA has the potential to be
>> the GA release.  It also has the potential to not be.  That's QA doing
>> it's job for you.  :-)
>>
>> b.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Lustre-discuss mailing list
>> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
>> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>>
>



More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list