[Lustre-discuss] Performance drop (1.6.5 vs 1.6.4.3, OFED 1.2)?
Mike Bui
mbui at datadirect.datadirectnet.com
Fri Oct 17 17:49:43 PDT 2008
Hello,
I have Lustre 1.6.5.1 and want to downgrade to Lustre 1.6.4.3 for better
performance, how would I do this ? Please advise.
Thanks,
Mike
Andrei Maslennikov wrote:
>
>
> *New performance numbers (1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1> vs 1.6.4.3
> <http://1.6.4.3>):*
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Client : Intel X5450 at 3.00GHz <mailto:X5450 at 3.00GHz> 2xQuad core,
> 16GB RAM,
> Infiniband, RHEL4 x86_64
> Servers: Official 1.6.4.1 <http://1.6.4.1/>
> Single stream writing: (lmdd of=/lustre/tstfileXX bs=1M time=200
> fsync=1)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> _2.6.9-67.0.20.ELsmp unmodified, OFED 1.2, *319
> MB/sec*
> _ _Lustre 1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1/> (with
> checksumming): _
> Client loads: lmdd - 100% (1 CPU), ptlrpcd - 5% , pdflush- 15%
> On 2 OSS servers in use: circa 50% total sys (2 CPUs), circa 10% I/O
> wait.
>
> _2.6.9-67.0.7.EL_lustre.1.6.5.1smp, OFED 1.3,
> *340 MB/sec*
> _ _Lustre 1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1/> (with checksumming):_
> Client loads: lmdd - 100% (1 CPU), ptlrpcd - 5%, pdflush- 15%
> On 2 OSS servers in use: circa 50% total sys (2 CPUs), circa 12% I/O
> wait.
>
> _2.6.9-67.0.20.ELsmp unmodified, OFED 1.2,
> *671 MB/sec*
> _ _Lustre 1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1/> (no checksumming) :_ *
> *
> Client loads: lmdd - 100% (1 CPU), ptlrpcd - 15%, pdflush- 2-3%
> On 2 OSS servers in use: circa 35% total sys (2 CPUs), circa 35% I/O
> wait.
>
> _2.6.9-67.0.7.EL_lustre.1.6.5.1smp, OFED 1.3,
> *670 MB/sec*
> _ _Lustre 1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1/> (no checksumming) :_
> Client loads: lmdd - 100% (1 CPU), ptlrpcd - 12%, pdflush- 2-3%
> On 2 OSS servers in use: circa 32% total sys (2 CPUs), circa 32% I/O
> wait.
>
> _2.6.9-67.0.4.EL_lustre.1.6.4.3smp, OFED 1.2,
> *843 MB/sec*_
> _Lustre 1.6.4.3 <http://1.6.4.3> _
> Client loads: lmdd - 100% (1 CPU), ptlrpcd - 20%, pdflush - 1%
> On 2 OSS servers in use: circa 33 % total sys (2 CPUs), circa 30%
> I/O wait.
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Running several (2,4) simultaneous jobs on the same 1.6.4.3
> <http://1.6.4.3> client
> does not improve the aggregate performance. I have seen 750 MB/sec
> aggregate with 4 streams, and 806 MB/sec aggregate with 2 streams.
>
> With 1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1> client with no checksumming I can get
> up to 800 MB/sec
> aggregate with 4 streams, and some 730 MB/sec with 2 streams.
>
> But Lustre 1.6.5.1 <http://1.6.5.1> is visibly (20%) less performant
> on a single stream when
> compared with 1.6.4.3 <http://1.6.4.3>.
>
> Andrei.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20081017/83c56431/attachment.htm>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list