[Lustre-discuss] MGS/MDS error: operation 101 on unconnected MGS

megan dobsonunit at gmail.com
Tue Sep 30 09:27:02 PDT 2008


More information:

I tried rebooting my MGD/MDS to see if that would solve my inability
to client-mount this disk problem.
No, it did not.

However,  I did try the following that might offer some insight to a
wise Lustre person.   On the MGS/MDS I did the following:
[root at mds1 tmp.BKUP]# mount -vv -t lustre ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3 /
tmp.BKUP/crew3
arg[0] = /sbin/mount.lustre
arg[1] = -v
arg[2] = -o
arg[3] = rw
arg[4] = ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3
arg[5] = /tmp.BKUP/crew3
source = ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3 (172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3), target = /
tmp.BKUP/crew3
options = rw
mounting device 172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3 at /tmp.BKUP/crew3, flags=0
options=device=172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3
warning: 172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3: cannot resolve: No such file or
directory/sbin/mount.lustre: unable to set tunables for
172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3 (may cause reduced IO performance)[root at mds1
tmp.BKUP]# df -h
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/sda2              29G   20G  7.5G  73% /
/dev/sda1             145M   17M  121M  13% /boot
tmpfs                1006M     0 1006M   0% /dev/shm
/dev/sda5              42G  6.2G   34G  16% /srv/lustre_admin
/dev/METADATA1/LV1    204G  5.3G  190G   3% /srv/lustre/mds/crew2-
MDT0000
/dev/sdf               58G  2.5G   52G   5% /srv/lustre/mds/crew8-
MDT0000
/dev/md0              204G  4.4G  188G   3% /srv/lustre/mds/crew3-
MDT0000
ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3    19T   17T  1.8T  91% /tmp.BKUP/crew3
[root at mds1 tmp.BKUP]# ls /crew3
ls: /crew3: No such file or directory
[root at mds1 tmp.BKUP]# cd /tmp.BKUP/crew3
[root at mds1 crew3]# ls
data  users
[root at mds1 crew3]# ls users
asahoo  hongbo  kristi  larkoc  qiaox  roshan  tugrul  yluo
[root at mds1 crew3]# cat /proc/fs/lustre/mds/crew3-MDT0000/
recovery_status
status: INACTIVE

Whoa!   The files are there; the disk is there.   The recovery_status
is still "INACTIVE".   Can this be correct?  The disk seems usable on
the (no user access *at all* MGS/MDS).

So on a client I did very similar:
[root at crew01 ~]# mount -vv -t lustre ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3 /crew3
arg[0] = /sbin/mount.lustre
arg[1] = -v
arg[2] = -o
arg[3] = rw
arg[4] = ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3
arg[5] = /crew3
source = ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3 (172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3), target = /
crew3
options = rw
mounting device 172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3 at /crew3, flags=0
options=device=172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3
warning: 172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3: cannot resolve: No such file or
directory/sbin/mount.lustre: unable to set tunables for
172.18.0.10 at o2ib:/crew3 (may cause reduced IO
performance)mount.lustre: mount ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3 at /crew3 failed:
Transport endpoint is not connected

Still the same error message "Transport endpoint is not connected".

How can other disks on the same MGS/MDS and same IB switch work on the
client and this one particular disk mount only on the MGS/MDS and not
on any client?

What do I need to do to fix it?

Thank you,
megan


On Sep 29, 11:34 am, "Ms. Megan Larko" <dobsonu... at gmail.com> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> It's Monday (sigh).  I lost one dual-core Opteron 275 of two on my OSS
> box over the weekend.  The /var/log/messages contained many "bus error
> on processor" messages.  So Monday I rebooted the OSS with only one
> dual core CPU.  The box came up  just fine and I mounted the three
> lustre OST disks I have on that box.  (CentOS 5
> 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5_lustre.1.6.4.3smp #1 SMP Sun Feb 17 08:38:44 EST
> 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux)
>
> The problem is now my MGS/MDS box cannot access/use the disks on that
> box.   The single MDT volume mounts without error but I see the
> following messages in the MGS/MDS /var/log/messages file:
>
> Sep 29 10:02:40 mds1 kernel: Lustre: MDT crew3-MDT0000 now serving dev
> (crew3-MDT0000/be7a58cd-e259-823f-486b-e974551d7ad6) with recovery
> enabled
> Sep 29 10:02:40 mds1 kernel: Lustre: Server crew3-MDT0000 on device
> /dev/md0 has started
> Sep 29 10:02:40 mds1 kernel: Lustre: MDS crew3-MDT0000: crew3d1_UUID
> now active, resetting orphans
> Sep 29 10:02:40 mds1 kernel: Lustre: Skipped 2 previous similar messages
> Sep 29 10:03:29 mds1 kernel: LustreError:
> 26914:0:(mgs_handler.c:515:mgs_handle()) lustre_mgs: operation 101 on
> unconnected MGS
> Sep 29 10:03:29 mds1 kernel: LustreError:
> 26914:0:(ldlm_lib.c:1442:target_send_reply_msg()) @@@ processing error
> (-107)  req at ffff81005986d450 x17040407/t0 o101-><?>@<?>:-1 lens 232/0
> ref 0 fl Interpret:/0/0 rc -107/0
> Sep 29 10:03:29 mds1 kernel: LustreError:
> 26915:0:(mgs_handler.c:515:mgs_handle()) lustre_mgs: operation 501 on
> unconnected MGS
> Sep 29 10:03:29 mds1 kernel: LustreError:
> 26915:0:(ldlm_lib.c:1442:target_send_reply_msg()) @@@ processing error
> (-107)  req at ffff810055ffac50 x17040408/t0 o501-><?>@<?>:-1 lens 200/0
> ref 0 fl Interpret:/0/0 rc -107/0
>
> The messages do not repeat.
>
> On MGS/MDS I also have [root at mds1 ~]# cat
> /proc/fs/lustre/mds/crew3-MDT0000/recovery_status
> status: INACTIVE
>
> The lctl can successfully ping the OSS and the OST appear correctly in
> lctl dl.  The peers on the MGS/MDS (which is still successfully
> serving other disks) appears normal.
> [root at mds1 ~]# cat /proc/sys/lnet/peers
> nid                      refs state   max   rtr   min    tx   min queue
> 0 at lo                        1  ~rtr     0     0     0     0     0 0
> 172.16.0.15 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8     7 0
> 172.18.1.1 at o2ib             1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8  -527 0
> 172.18.1.2 at o2ib             1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8  -261 0
> 172.18.0.9 at o2ib             1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8     7 0
> 172.18.0.10 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8     6 0
> 172.18.0.11 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8  -239 0
> 172.18.0.12 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8    -2 0
> 172.18.0.13 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8    -4 0
> 172.18.0.14 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8    -4 0
> 172.18.0.15 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8   -42 0
> 172.18.0.16 at o2ib            1  ~rtr     8     8     8     8     7 0
>
> With this information I Google searched on the error and I foundhttp://lustre.sev.net.ua/changeset/119/trunk/lustre.
> The page was timestamped 3/12/08 by Author shadow with the info below:
>
> trunk/lustre/ChangeLog
> r100   r119
> Severity   : major
>         16      Frequency  : frequent on X2 node
>         17      Bugzilla   : 15010
>         18      Description: mdc_set_open_replay_data LBUG
>         19      Details    : Set replay data for requests that are eligible for replay.
>         20      
>         21      Severity   : normal
>         22      Bugzilla   : 14321
>         23      Description: lustre_mgs: operation 101 on unconnected MGS
>         24      Details    : When MGC is disconnected from MGS long enough, MGS
> will evict the
>         25                   MGC, and late on MGC cannot successfully connect to
> MGS and a lot
>         26                   of the error messages complaining that MGS is not connected.
>         27      
>         28      Severity   : major
> 16      29      Frequency  : on start mds
> 17      30      Bugzilla   : 14884
>
> Okay.  I am still running 2.6.18-53.1.13.el5_lustre.1.6.4.3smp,  is
> there a way in which to get the MGS/MDS to once again access the OSTs
> associated with the MDT?
> The OSS box looks perfectly fine (minus one CPU).  All the errors
> appear on the MGS/MDS box.   The lustre disk will not mount on any of
> my clients.   The message "mount.lustre: mount ic-mds1 at o2ib:/crew3 at
> /crew3 failed: Transport endpoint is not connected"   is all that
> occurs.
>
> Suggestions and advice greatly appreciated.  Do I just have to wait a
> long time to let the disk "find itself"?   Using lctl device xx and
> activate did not help.
>
> megan
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-disc... at lists.lustre.orghttp://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss



More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list