[Lustre-discuss] GlusterFS compared to Lustre

[Robert Minvielle]

I have been doing some real world comparisons between the two
for a while now, as we were/are using GlusterFS in production,
but 2.0 is much slower than 1.4.0RC and lost MAC support...

If you would like details, I can put together my numbers and 
such and mail them to you, just drop me some email directly,
as I think the lustre people don't want us talking gluster in 
here. 

Oh, and we are most likely going to move to lustre, if that
helps out for now :)



----- "Nick Jennings" <nick at creativemotiondesign.com> wrote:

> Hey Guys,
> 
>   Sorry if this is the wrong place to post this, but I was wondering
> if 
> anyone has any thoughts on GlusterFS? It seems kind of like a
> user-space 
> version of Lustre, not cut out for huge clusters, but well suited for
> 
> smaller clusters without some of the resource requirements of Lustre.
> 
> I know it's not specifically Lustre related, but I don't know of a 
> better list of experts to post my questions to :)
> 
> -Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss