[Lustre-discuss] OST node filling up and aborting write
Minh Diep
Minh.Diep at Sun.COM
Fri Feb 27 18:40:05 PST 2009
Hi Nick,
Have you tried setting stripecount=-1 ?
Thanks
-Minh
Nick Jennings wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> I have a small lustre test machine setup to bring myself back up to
> speed as it's been a few years. This is probably a very basic issue but
> I'm not able to find documentation on it (maybe I'm looking for the
> wrong thing).
>
> I've got 4 OSTs (each 2gigs in size) on one lustre file system. I dd a
> 4 gig file to the filesystem and after the first OST fills up, the write
> fails (not enough space on device):
>
>
> # dd of=/mnt/testfs/datafile3 if=/dev/zero bs=1048576 count=4024
> dd: writing `/mnt/testfs/testfile3': No space left on device
> 1710+0 records in
> 1709+0 records out
> 1792020480 bytes (1.8 GB) copied, 55.1519 seconds, 32.5 MB/s
>
> # df -h
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/hda1 15G 7.7G 5.9G 57% /
> tmpfs 252M 0 252M 0% /dev/shm
> /dev/hda5 4.1G 198M 3.7G 6% /mnt/test/mdt
> /dev/hda6 1.9G 1.1G 686M 62% /mnt/test/ost0
> 192.168.0.149 at tcp:/testfs
> 7.4G 4.7G 2.4G 67% /mnt/testfs
> /dev/hda7 1.9G 1.8G 68K 100% /mnt/test/ost1
> /dev/hda8 1.9G 80M 1.7G 5% /mnt/test/ost2
> /dev/hda9 1.9G 1.8G 68K 100% /mnt/test/ost3
>
>
> I did this 2 times, which is why both ost1 and ost3 are full. As you can
> see, ost2 and ost0 still have space.
>
> I initially thought this could be solved by enabling striping, but from
> HowTo (which doesn't say much on the subject admittedly) I gathered
> striping was already enabled? (4MB chunks). So, shouldn't these OSTs be
> filling up at a relatively uniform ratio?
>
> # cat /proc/fs/lustre/lov/testfs-clilov-ca5e0000/stripe*
> 1
> 0
> 4194304
> 1
> [root at andy ~]# cat /proc/fs/lustre/lov/testfs-mdtlov/stripe*
> 1
> 0
> 4194304
> 1
>
>
> Thanks for any help,
> -Nick
> _______________________________________________
> Lustre-discuss mailing list
> Lustre-discuss at lists.lustre.org
> http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list