[Lustre-discuss] Lustre support for ipv6

[Brian J. Murrell]

On Fri, 2009-07-24 at 12:34 -0400, Chas Williams (CONTRACTOR) wrote:
> 

I am sure this response is not going to come with any amount of surprise
however...

> you should HAVE ipv6 support.

Indeed we should.  However, we have a long list of stuff that we should
have.  What we do have is a finite resource to try to empty that list.

> you would now have another reason lustre is "better".

Indeed.  There is lots on that list that would make Lustre "better" and
many of them would provide a more immediate "bang" than ipv6 support.
We always have to balance the items on that list with what will provide
the widest customer impact.

We are always very welcome to and appreciative of patches though.

b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20090724/279745f1/attachment.pgp>