[Lustre-discuss] e2scan MDT back-up
Brian J. Murrell
Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Wed Mar 4 09:51:49 PST 2009
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:42 +0000, Daire Byrne wrote:
> Brian,
Hi Daire,
> I looked at zumastor. Although it didn't get any slower with extra snapshots
> it took quite a hit (~ x6 drop in writes) with just a single snapshot.
Ouch!
> Far more promising is the port of zumastor exceptions to the kernel and the work
> being done to add a generic shared exception store interface to device-mapper
> (and ultimately LVM):
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-February/msg00014.html
Cool. Thanx for the pointer!
> It is a Redhat effort so it might actually be useful one day.
Heh. I guess with this economy, only time will tell.
b.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20090304/17c279ad/attachment.pgp>
More information about the lustre-discuss
mailing list