[Lustre-discuss] e2scan MDT back-up

Brian J. Murrell Brian.Murrell at Sun.COM
Wed Mar 4 09:51:49 PST 2009


On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 17:42 +0000, Daire Byrne wrote:
> Brian,

Hi Daire,

> I looked at zumastor. Although it didn't get any slower with extra snapshots
> it took quite a hit (~ x6 drop in writes) with just a single snapshot.

Ouch!

> Far more promising is the port of zumastor exceptions to the kernel and the work
> being done to add a generic shared exception store interface to device-mapper 
> (and ultimately LVM):
> 
>   https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2009-February/msg00014.html

Cool.  Thanx for the pointer!

> It is a Redhat effort so it might actually be useful one day.

Heh.  I guess with this economy, only time will tell.

b.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.lustre.org/pipermail/lustre-discuss-lustre.org/attachments/20090304/17c279ad/attachment.pgp>


More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list