[Lustre-discuss] lnet_try_match_md()) Matching packet from 12345-10.5.203.250 at tcp, match 19154486 length 728 too big

Alexey Lyashkov Alexey.Lyashkov at Sun.COM
Fri May 29 22:16:39 PDT 2009


Hi Michael,
 
> > On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 16:38 -0400, Michael D. Seymour wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> One client running CentOS 5.2 re-exports the Lustre filesystem via NFS on a 
> >> different network.
> >>
> >> We get the following messages on a particular client:
> >>
> >> May 22 15:07:45 trinity kernel: LustreError: 
> >> 5111:0:(lib-move.c:110:lnet_try_match_md()) Matching packet from 
> >> 12345-10.5.203.250 at tcp, match 19154486 length 728 too big: 704 left, 704 allowed
> > 
> > what frequently for this bug? 
> 
> Sets of entries (about 20) happen a few times per day, each entry spaced about 
> ten minutes apart.
can you please show syslog messages around this time - should be exist
lines with errors related to 'match XXXXX' (in this example match
19154486 -- should be something about request x19154486).

> 
> > if this quickly replicated - please set
> > lnet.debug=-1, lnet.debug_subsystem=-1 lnet.debug_mb=100, on mds and
> > client, replicate and save logs with lctl dk > $logfile.
> 
> Debugging has been enabled.I haven't been able to catch it in the act yet. Will 
> enabling the debug logging until I can catch the bug overflow anything?
you can use 'lctl debug_daemon start $file'
but at this case size is limited to 512M :\
If it possible to you i can make small patch which do dump lustre log if
this error is hit.


> 
> > after it - please fill a bug and attach log from MDS and client to bug.
> 
> A bug will be filed as soon as it can be caught with logging enabled.
> 
> > this message say - client want for reply less data when mds is send.
> 
> Trinity cannot accept data as large as the MDS is sending?
yes. this should be caused timeout on waiting answer to request and
later reconnect.


> 
> Thanks for you help,
> Mike
> 
> 
> 
-- 
Alexey Lyashkov <Alexey.Lyashkov at Sun.COM>
Sun Microsystems




More information about the lustre-discuss mailing list